I’m not sure I agree with championing student evaluations as he does as an adjunct to the argument , maybe she gives out too many B’s? And to nitpick, an argument that is “all light” (informative ) and “no heat” ( dispassionate) is usually welcome.
The gist of the argument was evaluations are racist and sexist. That, to me, is a straw man argument to get rid of them. If you assert that they may not be a fair and accurate tool, we can agree. But the nutty professor acts like the whole negative tenure decision was based on sexist, racist student evaluations. It was not.
EC