my heart goes out to these families
but anecdotes without statistics
does not prove anything
Indeed, that is correct. However considering the massive fraud in the [so-called] covid statistics we have been given, serious skepticism is in order.
Think of it this way, "they" have made certain we don't have and never will have *accurate* statistics. Thus proof in that form will not be forthcoming.
However, other statistical anomalies can provide useful information. Abnormal increases in certain types of cancers, physicians that report (even anecdotally) large increases in certain types of illnesses.
At the very least, the massive and draconian censorship efforts by pro jab institutions (government, big pharma, medical institutions) should cause serious concern as to the reliability of ANY information we get from them. Why? Who benefits from such censorship? They are not doing it for no reason.
This is an amazing book—after you read it you will never trust any statistics ever again:
https://www.amazon.com/How-Lie-Statistics-Darrell-Huff/dp/0393310728
You still wouldn’t believe it anyway. If they did, you would say the study was flawed. or you would complain about who did the study.