Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RandFan

I thought this was already known?

Curious… why would they need to pay doctors to push a “life saving” treatment?


10 posted on 08/21/2023 8:48:28 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Skywise
Curious… why would they need to pay doctors to push a “life saving” treatment?

To lower the amount of their overall payouts - fewer hospitalizations from serious illnesses - much lower exposure. Should be obvious. Those that were vaccinated got seriously ill and far lower rate of hospitalization than those were not. That amounts to many millions of dollars in lower payouts. Despite all of the lies and propaganda spewed by a handful here, the hospitalization rate was far, far lower for those that were vaccinated - not even close. Geniuses here posted articles citing data "50% of those hospitalized were vaccinated and 50% weren't! That proves the vaccine isn't effective!" or if it was something like 53% - 47% - they would argue "this proves the vaccines made things worse! We knew it! Ha!" - from a pool of people where the populations were up to 80-90% vaccinated in some of these posts. People would argue until they were blue in the face on these articles the data showed the vaccines were not effective at preventing hospitalization. Mind boggling the levels of willful and determined ignorance you have to hold if a 10-20% portion of the population makes up 50% of hospitalizations vs. the other 50% from 80-90% of the population and you interpret that as being the same rate of hospitalization. Yet they would sit here and argue that until the cows came home, gloating, and attacking those who pointed out the math were "paid deep state operatives", etc.

25 posted on 08/21/2023 9:17:10 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Skywise
Curious… why would they need to pay doctors to push a “life saving” treatment?

To lower the amount of their overall payouts - fewer hospitalizations from serious illnesses - much lower exposure. Should be obvious. Those that were vaccinated got seriously ill far less and far lower rate of hospitalization than those were not. That amounts to many millions of dollars in lower payouts. Despite all of the lies and propaganda spewed by a handful here, the hospitalization rate was far, far lower for those that were vaccinated - not even close. Geniuses here posted articles citing data "50% of those hospitalized were vaccinated and 50% weren't! That proves the vaccine isn't effective!" or if it was something like 53% - 47% - they would argue "this proves the vaccines made things worse! We knew it! Ha!" - from a pool of people where the populations were up to 80-90% vaccinated in some of these posts. People would argue until they were blue in the face on these articles the data showed the vaccines were not effective at preventing hospitalization. Mind boggling the levels of willful and determined ignorance you have to hold if a 10-20% portion of the population makes up 50% of hospitalizations vs. the other 50% from 80-90% of the population and you interpret that as being the same rate of hospitalization. Yet they would sit here and argue that until the cows came home, gloating, and attacking those who pointed out the math were "paid deep state operatives", etc.

27 posted on 08/21/2023 9:18:45 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson