Jack Smith is going to prevail in this last indictment. The trial date is everything. Here’s why

Flopping Aces ^ | 08-02-23 | DrJohn

[Starman417]

Biden's DOJ has indicted Donald Trump for the third time, but this one is different. Jack Smith has brought an indictment against Donald Trump that criminalizes free speech. The counts:

• Conspiracy to defraud the United States
• Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding
• Obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding
• Conspiracy against rights.

Professor Jonathan Turley described it this way:

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said Smith issued “the first criminal indictment of alleged disinformation.” “If you take a red pen to all of the material presumptively protected by the First Amendment, you can reduce much of the indictment to haiku,” he said. “I felt that the Mar-a-Lago indictment was strong. This is the inverse.”

Andy McCarthy:

Former New York federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy said Smith had to stretch the statutes to capture Trump’s behavior. “[Smith] has extravagantly stretched these statues in order to try and capture this behavior and that’s because this is a proxy for what should have been a political impeachment process they’re leaving to the criminal justice system, the failure of Congress to carry out a successful impeachment,” McCarthy said.

The timing of each of the Smith indictments is very curious

None of that matters. Despite his mixed record Smith is going to prevail.

1. It's in the DC venue
2. Because of lunatic U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan.

Chutkan was born in Jamaica and graduated from the University of Pennsylvania’s law school. She is married to former DC Superior Court Judge Peter Krauthamer.

Her resume includes a previous job likely to attract significant attention from Trump allies. She worked at the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner from 2002 until she was confirmed as a federal judge in 2014, according to a biography she submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Boies Schiller has strong connections to the Democratic Party, and then-second son Hunter Biden — whose dad, President Biden, is likely to face Trump in the 2024 election — was of counsel at the firm from 2009 to 2014, according to OpenSecrets.

She over-punishes right wingers, especially those from Jan 6

“Chutkan has handed out tougher sentences than the [Justice Department] was seeking in seven cases, matched its requests in four others and sent all 11 riot defendants who have come before her behind bars,” the AP wrote in a profile article last year.

“In the four cases in which prosecutors did not seek jail time, Chutkan gave terms ranging from 14 days to 45 days.”

She, like Smith, is a rabid partisan hack. The evidence won't matter. Justice won't matter. The Constitution won't matter. Motions to change venue will be denied. Trump is not well liked in DC. The jury will be fixed.

Trump will be convicted in this case. Chutkan is highly likely to sentence Trump to decades in prison adn taken into immediate custody. He will likely lose his appeal to the DC Circuit. But the news isn't all bad. The Supreme Court will see through this garbage and certainly overturn the case. But the point of the whole exercise is to keep Trump out of the race.

[Golden Eagle]

Don’t know how you make that sort of leap. I was 100% convinced it was stolen back in December 2020. I was also convinced Trump was going to eventually prove it too. But since he never really tried for all of 2021, or even since, I’m not that convinced anymore. Still over 50% belief that he was cheated, but not near 100%.

It appears from testimony under oath his own people told him he lost. Supposedly he commissioned two separate independent firms to investigate it, who told him he lost. Maybe he can finally prove something now, I sure hope so, we’ve only been waiting for years for something to slow the Democrats down in their bludgeoning of us all over J6.

But back to my question to you that you completely dodged. So you don’t think there’s any way that Trump could lose, except by Democrat cheating, right? You don’t think his behavior could have in any way alienated Republicans, and energized Democrats, to the point to even matter, is what it sounded like you said. Thanks.

[tet68]

Oh Divine Providence,
We beseech thee, preserve our nation from further democrat
“victories”. Amen.

[McGavin999]

Thank you, prayers are exactly what is needed.

[Dead Corpse]

Who did Biden/Harris appeal to? Their only qualification is “we’re not Trump” and their baggage was complicity hidden by the MSM.

For that they earned more votes than Obama? At 2AM?

Sure. You’re delusional if you think just because no one found the fire that all this smoke didn’t come from somewhere.

[FreeReign]

But back to my question to you that you completely dodged. So you don't think there's any way that Trump could lose, except by Democrat cheating, right? You don't think his behavior could have in any way alienated Republicans, and energized Democrats, to the point to even matter, is what it sounded like you said. Thanks.

Trump's behavior?

Trump's behavior of counter punching brought in 12 million voters who in the past were alienated by establishment Republicans.

Trump's policies were mostly the best in my lifetime.

The "behavior" of senile, incoherent, nasty, corrupt, communist enabling Joe Biden did not bring in 81 million votes.

Still over 50% belief that he was cheated, but not near 100%.

I don't agree.