[CFW]

This is big news and can affect several of the cases against independent media (especially O'Keefe) in which journalists record the actions of corrupt politicians and organizations only to find themselves in court charged with illegally recording the evidence of crimes.

[God luvs America]

So this would mean jack smith’s case against President Trump saying on a recording he had classified docs is kaput- correct?

[thinden]

So will this effect peep using FISA in secretly recording us citizens

[TLI]

“The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Monday that a law banning the recording of persons who do not explicitly consent to their voices being captured is unconstitutional, as it violates the First Amendment.”

Crooked cops (and others) are pizzed because their violations of the law are constitutionally recorded and can be used agaist them in a court of law.

Poor little cops, their one way street is closed for repair.

.

[CFW]

Below is a link to the complaint filed three years ago against the local DA and Oregon’s AG.

https://assets.ctfassets.net/syq3snmxclc9/3umr4skpDjZQtMMP6KhUM0/9b0d8597b97ac6ec156e89706226faa4/1_PVA_v._Schmidt_Verified_Complaint_Final_for_Filing.pdf

Below is the link to the opinion by Judge Ikuta with Judge Bea and Morgan concurring. Christen dissenting.

https://www.scribd.com/document/656890916/Project-Veritas-Et-Al-v-Mich-37

[Billthedrill]

I wonder if this might be extended to the prohibition on recording police activity. I always wondered how that could possibly be illegal.

[joma89]

Nice win, James!

[MeganC]

So this is the 9th? Then what effect will it have on David Daleiden?

[Twotone]

If you would like more information about what’s happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me. Please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list.

[bgill]

Ha!

Bam!

[Paleo Conservative]

So this should immediately affect California too.