He said vaccines in general…..didn’t mention the type of vaccine.
….
Here’s a disproportional response to your succinct remark.
Not arguing the validity of the SOPs mentioned by skr, but wouldn’t it be pointless to describe procedures that are independent of the subject matter being discussed?
For example, the assertion:
— The husband knew exactly what his wife was expecting.
The generality:
— It’s totally normal for a husband to be prepared for every possible expectation.
Regardless of the futility of being prepared, being prepared is ancillary to knowing exactly what the wife expressed that she expected.
Also, both skr and the article mention 100k doses. To me, it seemed that skr was defusing the accusations given the likelihood of the SOPs. But what are the odds that Moderna coincidentally developed a compatible vaccine ahead of the virus’ known existence?
Recall the many requests to get details about the virus’ molecular structure from the Chinese scientists in order to develop a vaccine? Yet, Moderna coincidentally had such a vaccine already on the shelf. Kinda like the husband that knew exactly what his wife expected.
skr made a good point, but one that didn’t account for the assertion that Moderna had a compatible vaccine.