Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: joesbucks

10 posted on 06/20/2023 8:20:10 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Bratch

In a subsequent case, the judge stated that the President among declassification is the action of notification. That was in the Judicial Watch v Clinton case.


15 posted on 06/20/2023 10:09:14 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Bratch
44 U.S.C. § 2201(2). The statute provides that “[t]he United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records,” id. § 2202, and it directs the President to “take all such steps as may be necessary to assure that the activities, deliberations, decisions, and policies that reflect the performance of his constitutional, statutory or other official or ceremonial duties are adequately documented and that such records are maintained as Presidential records,” id. § 2203(a).

As another court in this district has observed, “[t]he PRA incorporates an assumption made by Congress (in 1978) that subsequent Presidents and Vice Presidents would comply with the Act in good faith, and therefore Congress limited the scope of judicial review and provided little oversight authority for the President and Vice President's document preservation decisions.” CREW v. Cheney, 593 F.Supp.2d 194, 198 (D.D.C.2009). Indeed, the PRA permits the President to dispose of any Presidential records that “no longer have administrative, historical, informational, or evidentiary value” after notifying the Archivist of the United States and designated members of Congress of the proposed disposal. 44 U.S.C. § 2203(c), (d).

16 posted on 06/20/2023 10:13:00 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson