Replies

Like I said, the Mods found it objectionable. I am only speculating. You should ask then and get back with us.

“Given your UMC bonifides, how come you have not left a comment or stated your position on this in Free Republic? “

Funny with that remark, St Thomas Moore comes to mind.

If one is silent that does not imply consent or rejection.

Sure it does if they are asked a direct question on a matter that looms large in their occupation or calling.

Do the math - it's pretty damn obvious what's going on here with the frenzy of censoring on these Youkazoid propaganda threads.. .

Almost every one of my comments on this thread was pulled. Not one of them was abusive or insulting.But each of them ran counter to the dear Rev's insufferable, one-way Party line

Do. The. Math.

I'll finish with this: You suspect the comment we're discussing was pulled due to its "religious bigotry" even though it contained not a hint of bigotry but was simply a quote lifted from a recent news article. I also had the "temerity" to ask the fearless leader a single, pointed but respectful, comment regarding something huge affecting the church she ministers in. And that was it - no abuse, no name calling, nothing untoward or off-color.

So consider this: There are hundreds, (if not thousands) of abusive, derisive and bigoted comments about Islam on FR, some of them ultra nasty and graphic, and I have yet to see any of the ones I saw yanked though it is possible that some were. A true conservative ( and you are not one if you engage in ideological or opinion-based censorship on this or any other public forum) would never ask for one of them to be yanked unless they contained over-the-top obscenity or graphic depictions of something like bestiality.

There, I said what so many have been thinking. The only question is: What, if anything, is going to be done about the massive censoring on RevMom's threads - and pretty much nowhere else?