Report 69: BOMBSHELL – Pfizer and FDA Knew in Early 2021 That Pfizer mRNA COVID “Vaccine” Caused Dire Fetal and Infant Risks, Including Death. They Began an Aggressive Campaign to Vaccinate Pregnant Women Anyway.

You failed the reading test. Here is what the link I provided said:

“The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists estimates that miscarriage happens in about 10% of the women who know they are pregnant. However, the rate is likely much higher as many women have a miscarriage before they even know they’re pregnant.”

Miscarriages are a natural event—not caused by a vaccine!

And this information:

“Because Pfizer’s document doesn’t show the total number of women who were pregnant during the trial, it is impossible to calculate the rate of miscarriage based on this document alone. At best, we can calculate the rate of miscarriage based on the 50 pregnancies reported after dose 1. This rate is 6% (three reported miscarriages in a total of 50 pregnant individuals), well below the background rate in the general population. Yet, 11 of the pregnancies were still within their first 13 weeks, and therefore at risk of a potential miscarriage, at the time the table was created. In any case, the document doesn’t provide any evidence suggesting that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine caused the miscarriages or is unsafe for pregnant women.”

If you are to read the science, you should understand it too.

Because Pfizer’s document doesn’t show the total number of women who were pregnant during the trial, it is impossible to calculate the rate of miscarriage based on this document alone. At best, we can calculate the rate of miscarriage based on the 50 pregnancies reported after dose 1. This rate is 6% (three reported miscarriages in a total of 50 pregnant individuals), well below the background rate in the general population. Yet, 11 of the pregnancies were still within their first 13 weeks, and therefore at risk of a potential miscarriage, at the time the table was created. In any case, the document doesn’t provide any evidence suggesting that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine caused the miscarriages or is unsafe for pregnant women.

Did you read this (below)?

“At best, we can calculate the rate of miscarriage based on the 50 pregnancies reported after dose 1. This rate is 6% (three reported miscarriages in a total of 50 pregnant individuals), well below the background rate in the general population.”

What does the “background rate” say to you?

Did you know that eating common foods can cause a miscarriage? One common foods that can cause miscarriage is papaya. It contains many enzymes and pus that lead to uterine contractions, causing miscarriage. Due to the presence of enzymes, the uterus prompts to develop spasms, ending in miscarriage. Hence, one should avoid it in early pregnancy. People without any medical knowledge would confuse a COVID vaccination with the papaya as the cause for a miscarriage. Eating papaya adds to the “background rate.”

Another food is aloe vera juice. It’s not a drink I like but lots of people drink it and would be tempting for a pregnant woman that had it in their pantry.

Are you a big fan of sushi? Pregnant women should avoid sushi. It would be a mistake for a pregnant woman to think sushi had less risk than a COVID vaccine. In fact the COVID vaccine would prevent the virus from infecting their unborn child; causing a miscarriage.

BTW, I received my 4th vaccine, today, from my doctor. I told her about those trying to make the connection with the COVID vaccine to miscarriages. She chuckled at that idea. She told me her recent pregnancy brought into this world a healthy boy. She said there are many things a pregnant woman should avoid. The COVID vaccine is not one of them.

Breaking news from the famed medical journal DailyClout!

DailyClout CEO Naomi Wolf is pleased to welcome you to her latest venture.

And now a bit of background about Ms Wolf’s impressive background of slaying the patriarchy courtesy of one Liz Featherstone at the liberal flagship The New Republic:

“When I graduated from college in 1991, Naomi Wolf was a feminist icon, and the only person of or close to my generation who merited the designation. The weighty feminist classics that had shaken the world from the midcentury through the 1970s—Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex, Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique, Germaine Greer’s The Female Eunuch, Susan Brownmiller’s Against Our Will—had been read by millions. But the 1980s were a more pessimistic, less ambitious time. Under Ronald Reagan, George Bush, and Phyllis Schlafly, feminism was in retreat. The women’s movement was still intellectually fruitful—scholars and activists debated sexuality, class, and race in anthologies published by university presses—but it had lost its visceral urgency. Feminist ideas no longer seemed to inspire people to picket their workplaces or leave their husbands. The days of the feminist bestseller were past, it appeared—and with them, the power of a transformative movement.

“Published in 1990, Naomi Wolf’s breakout hit, The Beauty Myth, changed all that. Here was a feminist disquisition of old-school proportions: a big fat analysis of how profit and patriarchy conspire to make women feel bad about ourselves, joined with a call to action. Its author was pretty and presentable (“tourable,” as the publishing industry used to say before #MeToo). She could not be accused of sour grapes or resentment; a stereotypically “ugly” or even average-looking feminist would not have been able to attack the beauty industry with equal credibility. And like many books in the tradition of feminist screeds, The Beauty Myth’s power derives in part from prose that signifies both simplicity and profundity. Each chapter title, for example, is one word: “Work,” “Sex,” “Hunger.” A memorable image describes how the beauty myth functions: the iron maiden, a medieval torture instrument decorated on the outside with a smiling and attractive image of a young girl. The metaphor powerfully conveys how consumer society’s pretty pictures of pretty women mask the starvation and torture we endure in pursuit of beauty.

“The argument was systemic, and its claims went beyond the obvious. Wolf did not merely point out that the consumer products, fashion, and advertising industries profit by aggravating women’s insecurities, she rightly argued that judging women by their looks—judging ourselves by our looks—props up and perpetuates patriarchy. By keeping us thin, the beauty myth encourages us to take up less space. If our worth depends on our attractiveness and pliability, we are rendered invisible as we age and gain knowledge and political, economic, and social power. And the pursuit of beauty intrudes on our minds and exhausts our valuable energies. At the same time, Wolf defended the pleasures of beauty. Deftly rejecting the austere, defensive posture in which feminism had become stuck, she helped put the desires of a new generation into words: Glamour, she wrote, “is merely a demonstration of the human capacity for being enchanted and is not in itself destructive. We need it, but redefined.”

https://newrepublic.com/article/162702/naomi-wolf-madness-feminist-icon-antivaxxer

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.