Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: arthurus

I’ll admit I left my modifier dangling and further the proper work might by which instead of that. Grammar question however, it is not the subject that determine the conjugation of the verb? Since the vaccine is the subject (singular) would it not require a conjugation of the verb in the 3rd person singular. In this case saves? Were the subject pleural (vaccines for example) then it would be third person pleural conjugation (save)? If I diagram the sentence, the simple sentence is vaccine saves lives. I believe you have conjugated in your example based on the object, not the subject and it is the subject that determines the predicate.

There are not multiple vaccines against species. There is one vaccine to address the species not a distinction without difference

But you’re right — on review the sentence structure is not elegant.


56 posted on 04/15/2023 9:19:06 AM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: gas_dr

Pleural. Is this a lining-of-the-lung comment?


58 posted on 04/15/2023 9:57:38 AM PDT by arthurus (covfefe v)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

Both nouns are, in fact, plural but Bacteria does not have an “S” on the end so the sense of a scan is that it is singular and thus “saves” follows from it. Saves, at any rate, doesn’t agree with either noun.


60 posted on 04/15/2023 10:01:13 AM PDT by arthurus (covfefe v)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson