So why wasn’t there a motion to summarily dismiss?
That’s a good question. I think that first, Trump’s attorneys had to be fully informed of what the “charges” were. Second, now that they know what he is facing, they will analyze the “charges” and put together a motion for dismissal which will be upheld in the event the current judge doesn’t grant the motion. As best as I can understand this from reading through the various articles, many legal scholars are already saying that no statutory law was broken.