Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Spit.
1 posted on 03/15/2023 11:48:13 AM PDT by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: cuz1961
This judge is a... ..Dr-Tmvp-Ws-AEe-Xv

34 posted on 03/15/2023 12:36:48 PM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cuz1961

So corrupt bad cops are above the law.


35 posted on 03/15/2023 12:37:35 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cuz1961
So pathetic that American citizens are not able to defend themselves in a criminal fabricated circus put together by lying democrats, FBI, MSM..... SO DAMNED SAD!

"WE CANNOT EXPOSE THE REAL FELONS!!"

37 posted on 03/15/2023 12:42:24 PM PDT by high info voter (Delivery )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cuz1961
The article seems to say that normal cross-examination was allowed, but that normal cross-examination can only include asking questions about what the prosecution had already asked the witness about. From what I have gleaned as a layman this seems to be a normal court rule (at least it was on Perry Mason). It seems what was denied was the expansion of the topic of cross examination into the general corruption of the FBI.

That said, I think the case obviously should simply be thrown out and done and a full on investigation from an independent council should be ordered as its blatantly obvious that this was a political persecution and framing operation by the DOJ and senior FBI members.

However, the particular ruling was not something that goes against normal court procedure...rather it seems to just be following routine procedure in what has become a farce.

38 posted on 03/15/2023 12:48:04 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cuz1961

I wouldn’t call it a defeat. If someone comes up behind you and beats the crap out of you you don’t say that you were defeated. They are being screwed to put it mildly.


39 posted on 03/15/2023 12:50:02 PM PDT by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cuz1961

Well...there’s always prayer! And, then there’s...well, you know. Which is immediately gratifying but is, er..uh, sinful!


40 posted on 03/15/2023 12:50:41 PM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cuz1961

Lady Justice’s blind is on the ground and she’s pointing her finger at us while hysterically laughing.


41 posted on 03/15/2023 12:51:44 PM PDT by Dogbert41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cuz1961

Gitmo terrorist detainees had more rights.


50 posted on 03/15/2023 1:37:56 PM PDT by Leep (Hillary will NEVER be president! 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cuz1961

1984 in progress one step at a time before the big slam.


52 posted on 03/15/2023 1:46:16 PM PDT by Vaduz (LAWYERS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cuz1961

The right of cross-examination is more than a desirable rule of trial procedure. It is implicit in the constitutional right of confrontation, and helps assure the “accuracy of the truth-determining process.” It is, indeed, “an essential and fundamental requirement for the kind of fair trial which is this country’s constitutional goal.”

Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 295 (1973)


60 posted on 03/16/2023 5:36:23 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson