>>>> How exactly does one go about securing elections?
>>Wow. After you spent post after post, trying to claim that Trump is the most superhuman incomparable politician without equal, you’re now reduced to this, in defense of Trump taking that $250M meant for election security and spending it feeding his ego instead.
How exactly did Trump spend it to feed his ego?
>>To secure elections, you have to work on it, not just whine, like Trump. You do like DeSantis did in Florida, working to change the laws through partnerships in government.
Are you suggesting Trump “reach across the aisle?” Perhaps Trump should have been nicer to James Comey and Christopher Ray.
>>Since Trump has alienated most everyone, and has no real partners anymore, he could at least create an organization like True the Vote, which works to secure elections. Or at least donate to them. But nah, this is Trump, so that money is all going to build up his phony image instead.
Trump has embraced True the Vote and their film “2000 Mules.” D’Souza is a devout Trump supporter. Perhaps you have been confused by so-called “Fact Checkers.”
>>I am also aware that the fund-raising emails said that a large portion would go to the Save America PAC, which it did. It was deceitful. Read it for yourself: The ‘big rip-off’: how Trump exploited his fans with ‘election defense’ fund . . . https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/18/donald-trump-election-defense-fundraising-defrauded-fans
The Guardian, again? LOL! Perhaps you are upset that the Save America PAC will absorb many of the donations that previously went to the RINO-supporting RNC.
I know of one conservative outlet that says the creation of the Save America PAC is both strategic and smart. What do other conservative media outlets say? Do you know of any conservative media outlets? You have not quoted any.
>>Despite the nuances, all the millions of emails sent out from the @victory.donaldtrump.com address essentially said the same thing. They exhorted Trump supporters to back the “Official Election Defense Fund” with their hard-earned dollars.
Other than wasting one’s time “crossing the aisle,” do you have any other suggestions on how to end election fraud?
>>>> Where do you get your information?
>>As I said, it was being discussed here in January of 2021, and like you are now, I was under Trump’s spell at the time, and argued with other posters that Trump would never steal that money. How wrong I was, just as you are now. Articles like this were already out way back then: Trump Raised $250 Million Since Election To Challenge Outcome—Here’s Where Most Of The Money Will Actually Go. Jan 31, 2021... https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2021/01/31/trump-raised-250-million-since-election-to-challenge-outcome-heres-where-most-of-the-money-will-actually-go/?sh=10e708368824
First the Guardian, and now the Never-Trump Forbes mag? LOL!
BTW, I had previously read that Forbes article by Jemima McEnvoy. One of her goto sources was Philip Bump of the Washington Post. Isn’t Bump one of those far-left hacks who claimed the Hunter Laptop story was disinformation?
>>>> NPR propaganda...every left-wing talking point...Rule for Radicals...
>>Nope, I am attacking Trump from the RIGHT, not left. I don’t approve of his big government, big spending, LGBTQ agenda built on lies and stealing donations you are so proud of. I find it appalling, and insulting.”
Conservatives do not attack conservative using far-left talking points
>>>> On whose orders was the “gain of function” research reinstated?
>>The White House ultimately has control over that decision, via the Chief Scientist and HHS Secretary. It was made at near the exact time that Trump was courting Bill Gates for the Chief Scientist role at the White House.”
Are you saying that Trump should have been a micromanager? That makes no sense.
And why the exaggeration about Gates? According to Gates own statements, Trump was not “courting” him to be the science advisor. Gates said Trump was merely responding to a statement by Gates that the administration needed a science advisor. Trump asked him if he wanted the job, Gates said no, and that was the end of it.
>>>> I seriously doubt he knew what it was.
>>Once again, your superhero idol is reduced to ignorance below the average Freeper, as we were discussing that issue hot and heavy every day here at that time. Even the dementia patient Biden knows what gain of function is, yet Trump doesn’t? How pathetic must Trump be, even in your eyes, to be so ignorant on such an important topic?
Most everyone knows what gain of function means now, but what about back in 2018? The bureaucrats were not exactly keeping Trump informed — misinformed, perhaps, but not informed.
>>Biden Still Supports Gain-of-Function Research Despite Potential Covid Links: https://www.nationalreview.com/news/biden-still-supports-gain-of-function-research-despite-potential-covid-links/
I have a link that alleges Fauci misled Trump about gain of function research in Wuhan:
I have the book by Markson that is referenced in the article.
>>>> Soros gave money to many GOP candidates. How much did he give to Trump’s campaign?
>>Try $160M to help fund Trump’s Chicago tower. Yet you so far have NOTHING but empty claims on DeSantis. NOTHING. . . . Donald Trump has lined up three New York hedge funds, including money from billionaire George Soros, to invest $160 million in his Chicago skyscraper, a key piece in perhaps the largest construction financing in the city’s history, according to real estate sources and public documents.
That was a business deal, not a political campaign donation! Geesh! Have you seen the Trump Tower in Chicago?
https://rfp.selecthotelsresorts.com/hotels/80530.jpg
Not bad, huh? There are 10 Trump towers in various parts of the world. Now, tell us, what has DeSantis produced?
>>>> desperate troll
>>Desperate? All I’ve done is compile a book of the lies and sins of Donald Trump, that you will excuse no matter what.
“Spins” is a more accurate characterization than “lies and sins.”
>>I haven’t even mentioned his well known and admitted close friendship with Jeffery Epstein, and the fact the main witness against him was recruited right there in Mar-a-Lago, but I’m sure your denial runs deep for that whole escapade too.
Trump and Epstein were friends for about 20 years. They were neighbors in Palm Beach, and attended the same parties. Big deal.
I am unfamiliar with the 2nd part. I have heard that Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago in about 2008 for hitting on the daughter of one of the members.
>>Trump even appointed Alex Azar into his cabinet, who was most famous for letting Epstein off in Florida for the original child sex charges. Small world, huh.”
It is too big for you. It was not until July 2019 that the indictment was unsealed by federal prosecutors. Acosta resigned as Labor Secretary about a week later.
>>>> Everything claim you make against Trump is a well-established left-wing talking point.
>>I’m coming from the right my friend, every thing I have listed is an anathema to Christian and conservative values. You’re the one defending the lifelong liberal from New York and all his fancy lies, not me.
That is another left-wing talking point. At least 35 years ago Trump stated publically that he supported the platform of the Republican Party. This is a Larry King interview of Trump in 1987:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8wJc7vHcTs
This is a Rona Barrett interview in 1980:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAgJAxkALyc
This is Oprah in 1988:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEPs17_AkTI
>>>> Again, Trump has a sense of humor, and you do not.
>>Oh, so know you’re even willing to defend Trump’s talk of murder in the street, and how his supporters are so brainwashed they would still support him.
That is silly. The left loves “conservatives” like you. Have you seen this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XoS-s4DIGE
>>Obviously we have you as Exhibit A. As I said, my disdain for Trump is from my Christian conservative background, and I would never defend a statement made like that from a politician, I don’t care who they are.
You should try finding better fact checkers if you wish to qualify as a Christian Conservative. Thus far you appear to be little more than a gossiper and leftwing hack.
>>They are elected to defend the laws of the country, ideally the laws of the Bible. Yet you support him making a mockery of both.
I support Trump because I believe he is the only that can and will clean up this mess, if given the chance.
>>Reply or not, I am done with this thread. There is nothing else to be gained debating with you, being someone who would excuse Trump for shooting someone in the street, just as he demands. The people that defend such sinful talk upset me almost as much as the glutton himself. Good day.
Don’t let the screen door hit you in the butt on the way out.
Mr. Kalamata
Bttt
