Is “tacit approval” of Al-Qaeda means guilty in this exact operation?
A person pretending to care about the rule of law knows that the answer is no.
The US government is working with Al-Qaeda since before 2010 by the way.
I mentioned that you ignored the second part of the question. It is expected when talking to a phony like you.
“Is ‘tacit approval’ of Al-Qaeda means guilty in this exact operation?”
It means the Taliban were a legitimate target.
“A person pretending to care about the rule of law knows that the answer is no.”
Actually, our attack on al-Queda and its supporters and followers was very much within the law.
“The US government is working with Al-Qaeda since before 2010 by the way.”
You are delusional. Not even Barack Obama, who was president in 2010 was working with al-Queda; and Barack Obama was no lover of the United States.
“I mentioned that you ignored the second part of the question. It is expected when talking to a phony like you.”
What second part of the question? Iraq? I answered that. I said the attack on Iraq had nothing to do with any Iraqi involvement in 9/11.
Don’t they teach reading comprehension in Russia?