[fireman15]

instead of answering the question of “what have I posted about Kirsch that isn't true”, you choose to launch an ad hominen attack

I asked people who were interested to review your posting history. Admittedly you should be very embarrassed by your posting history, but that is not what most would consider an ad hominem attack.

[DugwayDuke]

fireman15 wrote: “I asked people who were interested to review your posting history. Admittedly you should be very embarrassed by your posting history, but that is not what most would consider an ad hominem attack.”

I have no reason to be embarrassed by my posting history. But for the record an ad hominen attack is characterized as: “directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.”

Now exactly where have you attempted to refute my arguments rather than making personal attacks?