Anyone who wants to have that question answered should take the time to review your posting history. You argue not with facts or even informed opinion, your favored tool is character assassination by mischaracterization and half-truths. You should be embarrassed by your despicable individual posts, but it is your body of work that paints a very ugly picture of your demeaner. Unfortunately, it is a reflection of the cancel culture that has become so prevalent in our society that takes down anyone who disagrees with the approved narrative. You are a complete tool of the left and for anyone to pretend otherwise is very dishonest.
fireman15 wrote: “Anyone who wants to have that question answered should take the time to review your posting history. You argue not with facts or even informed opinion, your favored tool is character assassination by mischaracterization and half-truths. You should be embarrassed by your despicable individual posts, but it is your body of work that paints a very ugly picture of your demeaner. Unfortunately, it is a reflection of the cancel culture that has become so prevalent in our society that takes down anyone who disagrees with the approved narrative. You are a complete tool of the left and for anyone to pretend otherwise is very dishonest.”
instead of answering the question of “what have I posted about Kirsch that isn’t true”, you choose to launch an ad hominen attack. I would suggest that your post is the perfect example of the cancel culture.
Care to explain why two boards of directors choose to disassociate themselves from Kirsch?
Care to explain why we should trust Kirsch’s comments on vaccines when the boards of directors, who were in a better position to know, found his comments to be that egregious?