Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke

OK, for the sake of argument, let’s say you’ve debunked Kirsch.

Now debunk the FAA.


80 posted on 01/18/2023 6:12:44 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: DuncanWaring

This is not an attempt to confirm or refute the original article, but to add a little more context. I am an experienced AME designated by the FAA to conduct all classes of aviation medical exams.

Yes, the did modify the the “normal variants” standards on EKGs (required annually for 1st class medical on pilots over 40) on or around Oct 26, 2022.

First-degree AV (atrioventricular) block with PR interval less than 0.21 in age < 51

CHANGED 10/26/2022 TO:

First-degree AV (atrioventricular) block with PR interval less than 300 ms (0.30 sec).

https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/offices/aam/ame/guide/media/Normal_Variants.pdf

There have been published reports of an association between Covid infection and atrioventricular block. Whether that could be the case from vaccine injury, I do not know. The foci of myocarditis that was reported in the recent German autopsy report of individuals found dead at home would not have led to this change, rather, ventricular tachycardia, or similar.

I do know that even those outside of “normal” parameters can get a medical. And there are a LOT of things that are “abnormals” that the FAA allows, and these have not changed.


91 posted on 01/18/2023 9:33:31 AM PST by A Mississippian (Proud 7th generaion Mississippian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson