Fit and healthy young people are suffering cardiac arrests at an alarming rate yet corporate media and UK government won’t discuss it

The Exposé ^ | Rhoda Wilson

[AppyPappy]

Covid was causing heart damage long before the vaccines. One of my former students got heart damage from Covid that she foolishly called “Long Covid”. She finally was diagnosed 2 years later.

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/heart-problems-after-covid19

[AppyPappy]

Article from 2020
https://www.heart.org/en/news/2020/09/03/what-covid-19-is-doing-to-the-heart-even-after-recovery

[Svartalfiar]

Only American Covid experts would be baffled by Haitian death rates from Covid being negligible. Haitian people are smart enough to not trust anyone, except for maybe Sean Penn.

Haiti got lucky, because it was their extremely crappy government being useless, on top of an extremely poor society that caused them to not get the shots. Haitians are not 'smart'. You can see their border with the Dominican Republic from space - because Haitians deforested their side. They're one of the poorest countries in the world for a reason. They just got lucky that inept/lacking government, with no significant logistical capability, meant they didn't get the shots forced on 'em.

[semimojo]

It is definitely not normal for so many mainly young athletes to suffer from cardiac arrests or to die while playing their sport, but this year it is happening.

Funny that The Expose never has any data to back that assertion up.

Why do they think there are more sudden deaths of athletes now than before the vaccines?

Because there are more death articles posted on FR?

It should be easy to show the data if there's a big problem worldwide.

[Svartalfiar]

Simple math: Less than 1 million out of 265 million computes to 99.7+% have not reported adverse effects.

Huh. Not sure where you get your numbers from. According to the CDC's own released data, I pretty quickly find these numbers:

The agency [CDC] in court papers said that on or before Sept. 30, it would post on its website a “public use” set of data from about 10 million people who signed up for its “v-safe” program..
...
According to ICAN, 7.7% of the v-safe users -- 782,913 people -- reported seeking medical attention via a telehealth appointment, urgent care clinic, emergency room intervention or hospitalization following a COVID-19 vaccine
...
In the first week after getting the shot, the [CDC] spokesperson continued, "reports of seeking any medical care (including telehealth appointments) range from 1-3% (depending on vaccine, age group and dose)."

So that means, based on this group followed, they saw the equivalent of ~20MM medical issues within your 265MM population. The CDC spokesguy defending the "vaccines" admits to 1-3% within the first week, which is 2.5-8MM casualties. THAT THE CDC ADMITS TO. Go past one week, you bet they'd find a lot more. And this is based on people admitting problems, so there's certainly plenty that have minor (or maybe major) issues but didn't notice or report them. Of course, not all these issues were necessarily caused by the "vaccines", but I would guess it's likely everything reported could have been caused by it, I doubt people reported broken arms or other obvious-cause injuries in this.

And of course, this obviously doesn't include all the issues that are yet to happen, so these numbers can really only go up (most who haven't gotten the shots are very unlikely to change their minds now).

[Svartalfiar]

It is definitely not normal for so many mainly young athletes to suffer from cardiac arrests or to die while playing their sport, but this year it is happening.

Funny that The Expose never has any data to back that assertion up.

Here you go. One article amongst many found via a quick search. Try it some time!

https://yournews.com/2022/06/11/2357621/study-finds-athlete-deaths-are-1700-higher-than-expected-since/

[semimojo]

One article amongst many found via a quick search. Try it some time!

Ah! The old Lausanne paper that's been misrepresented and misunderstood by anti-vaxers here for over a year.

The study that didn't attempt to determine the number of deaths.

The study that only reviewed the deaths reported in 8 journals.

The study where the authors explicitly stated, in the paper, that the reported deaths were underreported:

"The most important limitation however is that SCD in young athletes as reported in the published and studied papers is certainly underestimated. Most of the events occur in youth potentially involved in sports activities, which are not reported in the literature. SCD is therefore likely to have comprised more than the 1101 athletes in the 38-year period across the world, which we reported. The lack of national or international registers and the uncertainty of the number of athletes involved forms the basis of this problem. An effort to inventory all cases of SCD in the future seems mandatory."

Thanks for posting it but it has no relevance to this discussion.

Does it bother you at all that the lying grifters at yournews.com knowingly misrepresent this report and play you for a sucker?

[Svartalfiar]

Just because the deaths were underreported doesn't mean the numbers are completely useless. Do you really think those numbers undercounted athlete deaths by a factor of ten or more? And looking past the kiddie deaths to regular athletes - how do you explain the increase in those deaths?


The study that only reviewed the deaths reported in 8 journals.

Forty-seven articles were analysed and are represented in Table 1.

I may not good add any more, but pretty sure 47 is a good bit more than 8. Sure, some of those are the same journal, but published different years. Still more than 8 of them represented. From your link.

[semimojo]

Do you really think those numbers undercounted athlete deaths by a factor of ten or more?

Easily.

The study made no effort to identify all deaths - that wasn't relevant to their objective. They only looked at deaths that had been written up in the medical literature and appeared in one of 8 databases:

"For a meta-analysis of the existing literature on sudden death in sports and the effectiveness of PPSP, the following databases were searched: Medline (OVID Web, 1966–2004), PubMed (1966–2004), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EBM Reviews – ACP Journal Club, Cinahl 1982–2004, Heracles, Web of Science, Scopus <1960–2004. We used ‘sudden cardiac death’ and ‘preparticipation’ as keywords, combined with ‘sports’, ‘sports medicine’, ‘athletic injuries’, ‘exercise’ and ‘athletes’. Restrictions were English language and human subjects."

Many, many deaths occur that aren't written up in medical journals, as the authors acknowledge when they say most of these deaths don't get recorded.

Worse, the liars in your article compare a small subset of deaths among athletes under 35 to the ludicrous goodsciencing.com list of deaths among anyone they could find worldwide who at some point in their lives had some connection to sports (an announcer!!!). And it includes people who died into their seventies!

Why try to defend this dishonesty?