[CivilWarBrewing]

Agreed BUT it's darn near impossible to PROVE intent.

What Team Lake DID prove was that CHAIN OF CUSTODY was BROKEN during transport of ballots to RUNBECK. This COULD allow for the introduction of ballots and/or the destruction of ballots.

[madison10]

Not that difficult when the paper was the wrong size. That so-called new governor had all the “mistakes” done on purpose.

[PeterPrinciple]

Agreed BUT it’s darn near impossible to PROVE intent.

---

could we call it a hate crime? easy then.

[PGR88]

Agreed BUT it's darn near impossible to PROVE intent.

I'm not an electoral lawyer, but I don't believe you need to prove intent. Basis DOJ, DOT, and HUD (ie Fed.gov) standards of circumstantial and statistical evidence used to prove "bias" and "racial prejudice," in everything from housing to employment to voting - the AZ election should be voided immediately.

If these were black districts, and the same electoral anomalies occurred, the DOJ would already have arrested main players and sued the state to void the election.

[cuz1961]

Agreed BUT it’s darn near impossible to PROVE intent/\

The machines were tested the night before.

Keri’s court had county admitting the error setting was made the next day.

That spells

I
N
T
E
N
T

Imho.

[HamiltonJay]

Intent is irrelevant. If it affected the election the election must be rebels…

This isn’t a criminal trial where intent must be proven. All that needs prove on is that the election was tainted..

It completely was