Recap of Kari Lake First Day of Trial – Judge Schedules Tomorrow’s Trial From 8:30 MST to 4:30 MST. (VIDEO)

gateway pundit ^ | 12/21/2022 | jordan conradson

[henbane]

Better is the chain of custody question.

Absolutely!

Watched the video showing "Expert Heather Honey, Investigator and Supply Chain Expert with 30+ years experience sends hack defense lawyer packing . . . ."

The way the defense lawyer folded up and bailed out after Honey's response, looks like the defense is in deep trouble.

“They Weren’t Following the Legal Requirements for Chain of Custody” – Expert in Kari Lake Trial, Heather Honey, Destroys Maricopa’s Defense

[Regulator]

What’s fascinating is that this is the first time the little detour through the Runbeck facility has ever come up.

Never heard of that in the 2020 election. All the years I voted in Arizona, never conceived of such a thing.

It shows the R’s are like babes in the woods. They just don’t know how the system works. Meanwhile, Rat apparatchiks are gleefully pulling every stunt they can think of while the R’s are busy running after some ghost theory. The crimes have been happening right under their noses.

[SteveH]

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2022/12/22/no-evidence-of-misconduct-in-1st-day-of-kari-lake-election-challenge-trial/69745880007/

[Tupelo]

I have a question.
Did RNC roving attorney Mark Sonnenklar testify for the plaintiff (Lake) or the defense (Hobbs)?

[usnavy_cop_retired]

As explained during today’s portion of the trial, the issues were:

1. Ballots for the general Nov 2022 election were all set at 20” paper size.

2. The “on demand ballot printers” were pre-programmed by the county and admin password required to change the image parameters.

3. The printer printed out a 19” ballot on the 20” paper.

4. The tabulator/s were unable to read the ballots because the 19” image was not recognized by the tabulator.

5. The “unread” ballots were placed in drawer 3 to be transported later to the county central county center where they were then run through the county tabulator, (different machine, more sensitive), and when it still would not read the ballot the ballot was “duplicated”.

6. Duplication involved printing a new, 20”, blank ballot and copying, (supposedly), accurately the rejected ballot onto the new 20” ballot and then run through the tabulator and counted.

7. One problem identified during the court ordered exam of the ballots was that the original ballot, (19” ballot printed on 20” paper), that the expert examined were not accompanied with the “duplicate ballot” that are required to be kept with the original ballot and he was told that it would take 6 hours to track down the “duplicate ballot” for the expert to view.

8. The state tried to explain the 19-20” issue away by suggesting that someone might have pushed a print to size button, however, since the county recorder testified that only 20” images were on the computer/printer, thus making pushing a print to size button would not result in the printer printing a 19” image/ballot on a 20” paper because shrinking to fit the paper would only result in printing a 20” ballot image.

[Dan in Wichita]

Let’s put it this way if this was Stacy Abrams and this was Georgia in 2018 this amount of evidence presented MSNBC would be holding a 24 hour vigil outside the governors mansion waiting for Kemp to step down.

Absolutely true.

And when there is overwhelming evidence of fraud when a Republican loses, there is total silence.

[cpdiii]

A printer will have precise instructions on how the ballot is printed. He will print a few. He will then compare what he printed too the original instructions. If the same he will then print 100 of thousands. This stinks.

[LVS1]

The tabulator looks for the witness marks that should be near the edge of the paper, when it sees more paper at the top/bottom then it assumes it's another ballot jammed in the machine and throws an error.

it's not the length of the paper, it's how long the tabulator THINKS it is.