Posted on 12/20/2022 6:57:44 PM PST by shadowlands1960
Bkmk.
Thanks.
I was wondering if the Ohio researcher was Dr. Tenpenny.
That is not “annecdotal” but the statistics of a small number. There is this thing called the central limit theorem. Once you have a large enough sample to observe a few of the thing that you are trying to see, your statistics are pretty close to what a full count of the entire population will yield. So discounting uninteded but operative statistical biases in your sample. A sample of 10 in which some have one thing and some another is a pretty good count.
Lots of confusion here. And the ultimate blame is with the federal government. They do not allow any public discussion of this very important subject.
There should be a vigorous and ongoing debate regarding all aspects of the Covid vax. Get medical researchers from both sides. Put it on C-Span.
But, no. All we get is the Fauci viewpoint, period. And he has already discredited himself. No wonder so many folks are skeptical.
Whatever...
Disallowing skepticism is actually ‘anti-science.’
Your understanding is wrong as usual
But the covidians say their cases are much milder than the unvaxxed cases.
> I was wondering if the Ohio researcher was Dr. Tenpenny. <
Probably not. If Tenpenny were involved, she would have included ads for her books and seminars.
There are frauds both sides of the vax argument. As I see it, Tenpenny is a fraud on the anti-vax side. Of course your mileage may very.
But I will give Tenpenny credit for one thing. She does have a cool last name.
—> After he was on Tucker he was banned by every social platform on the planet and those out there in other worlds.
A fantastic endorsement!
I work with someone who refused the vaccines. She got Covid two years ago, and again a month ago, less severely, and tested positive without illness sometime in between when other family members were sick.
No grain of salt needed from my own observations. It sucks though. There’s a huge increase in demand for my type of work and way less people to do it.
“ The section above the paywall didn’t cite the exact studies or who and where they came from... so, ‘grain of salt’ etc...”
No. These are crappy articles.
just found out someone who needs an operation for cancer won’t be able to get it unless they test negative for covid- apparently covid dictates everything now- and determines even the life of sick folks whether they can live or not-
i got to one study from a link on the substack.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full.pdf
there’s a bunch of lauding the 30% ‘effectiveness’ of the vaccine. (that’s actually terrible), given the incidence of infection during the study is about 2-4 per 10,000, if i read it right. more lying with stats.
but, the money chart is at the end, confirming the substack as the incidence of infection goes up with the number of jabs.
Ping.
But, the real case study is my unvaxed, 84-year mother who has COPD so bad she can't walk across a room with her walker without stopping to catch her breath. And cardio problems as well. She got the same treatment as me and, after testing positive at home one week after I did, had nothing more than a modest headache for a few hours.
Exactly one year later we're currently both enjoying our excellent natural immunity.
Anybody need some "horse dewormer"?? (Actually, I think I'll hang onto that for it's anti-inflammatory properties.)
I was wondering this the other day. I only know one unvaccinated person who got covid twice, but several who were fully vaccinated and got it 2 or 3 times.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.