Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Macho MAGA Man

I can’t for the life of me understand why they took the case. There is not a chance they will rule against the election validity. Not one.


19 posted on 12/14/2022 9:28:37 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (Just my thoughts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sequoyah101

Gots to keep up some façade of election integrity (lol) , before total collapse in this way of govt, which then causes them to be nothing and of no consequence.


21 posted on 12/14/2022 9:32:20 AM PST by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Sequoyah101
I can’t for the life of me understand why they took the case. There is not a chance they will rule against the election validity. Not one.

SCOTUS has neither taken this case, nor rejected the case. It is now at the conference stage, meaning that at least one justice wishes to discuss the case with the others. I can't find recent numbers, but in the past only about a third of all petitions for certiorari filed were chosen for a conference discussion. So far, this case is beating the odds.
30 posted on 12/14/2022 9:45:59 AM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Sequoyah101
I can’t for the life of me understand why they took the case. There is not a chance they will rule against the election validity. Not one.

You missed the writ of quo warranto, which this case closely resembles, but that needs to be filed in D.C., not Utah.
34 posted on 12/14/2022 9:51:43 AM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson