Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: StAnDeliver
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act did indeed put preggers in the protected class. See the section on Young v. United Parcel Service for its current-day status.

I mis-spoke, and yet here's the reality: She's only protected if she was fired because she's pregnant.

She's the one with the burden of proof, to prove that claim true. Not Twitter/Musk.

Being part of a mass layoff very likely gives Twitter/Musk cover.

84 posted on 11/07/2022 11:23:15 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: usconservative
" She's the one with the burden of proof, to prove that claim true. Not Twitter/Musk. Being part of a mass layoff very likely gives Twitter/Musk cover."

Agreed on both counts. She actually screwed up royally by bragging about her positive reviews and her team kudos, instead she should have indicated she could fulfill the test in Young, ie, "I was not accommodated on x number of occasions and I have receipts."

But what can you do, her name is Wu (lol).

119 posted on 11/08/2022 5:43:45 AM PST by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson