Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CatOwner

They’ll try to count ‘em, no doubt. At which time, a very angry PA SC might say “do over”.

At your expense, from the top.


12 posted on 11/01/2022 9:06:54 PM PDT by chiller (Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'll go ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: chiller

Is there a way to separate these ?


14 posted on 11/01/2022 9:08:56 PM PDT by chiller (Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'll go ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: chiller
a very angry PA SC might say “do over”.

No court can order a 'do over' due to the plenary powers states share over elections with Congress.

A court can determine if state election law was violated, and that is about the extent of its powers. With that, a quo warranto court action can remove candidates seated as a result of the election. That's what they did after the Civil war to the warring Southern states.

Once the security envelope is opened and processed it's statement of legal qualification and voter identification is no longer tied to any ballot. So there's no 'reversing' the process, which is why Democrats use this cheat in the first place.

25 posted on 11/02/2022 8:13:36 AM PDT by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson