[Fury]

The government and pharma need to use proven research methods. Have never state otherwise.

But if the writer in “The Expose” is going to make a claim, he/she needs to be back it up. It’s the lazy way to make the claim and then ask others to prove his/her claim.

[metmom]

He’s not making an unreasonable claim at all. The onus is on the pharm industry from the very start to prove that the so-called vaccines are safe and they did not.

At that point it is an entirely reasonable position to hold that they are not safe because they have not been proven to be safe.

Once they have gone through what should have been big pharmas standard rigorous safety testing standards, then yes, if someone wants to claim they are dangerous, then they need to give evidence as to why they think that way.

But since big pharma itself ditched its own protocol and then demands we presume they’re safe until proved otherwise, then they have no case. On the contrary, all it does is make them look more guilty and more complicit in a cover up.

Show us the long term testing that proves the vaxxes are safe. If you can’t, nobody is obligated to accept that they are just on their or your say so.

[metmom]

The government and pharma need to use proven research methods. Have never state otherwise.

And they didn’t, hence the objection to the assumption that they are safe.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

Fury :" But if the writer in “The Expose” is going to make a claim, he/she needs to be back it up.
It’s the lazy way to make the claim and then ask others to prove his/her claim."

A very good point !
Verification of the writers statistics would occur in the actuarial tables of the life insurance companies.