Posted on 10/24/2022 1:25:34 AM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
“Ask Russia. I don’t really care.
Well, you must care at least somewhat or else you wouldn’t have brought it up.
Russia said it had evidence that Ukraine was planning to use a dirty bomb. You said quite definitively that “...Ukraine will be slipped a dirty bomb to set off.”
I said that if Russia has such evidence, it should release it to the public; or, it can release it to the UN and it can make it public.
Now, do you also have evidence that “...Ukraine will be slipped a dirty bomb to set off?”
There is a hell of a lot of sensationalism and alarmism being posted on FR re: the Russia-Ukraine War. Not the least of which is all this hyperventilating over inevitable — if not imminent — nuclear war, which almost exclusively comes from the pro-Russia FReepers, with the blame usually dropped at the feet of the US and NATO. While a dirty bomb is a far cry from a nuclear weapon, it is nonetheless irresponsible to declare with definitiveness that such a use is at hand.
Let’s see the evidence, and step back from conjecture.
“So, do YOU know? And I mean actual evidence and proof, not supposition and hearsay and innuendo.”
Your ability to reason is now shown not possible, so I’m done wasting my time with you.
“Your ability to reason is now shown not possible, so I’m done wasting my time with you.”
You phony! You asked me the question, and I responded. I then asked you the EXACT same question, and you respond with the above?
You’re like a little kid! You can’t compete in the game you yourself chose, so you take your ball and run home.
Is the Ukraine a treaty nation we are obligated to defend? No. What strategic value is the Ukraine to the USA? None.
Before the war was the Ukraine considered a corrupt money laundering cesspool by the entire world, being used by western governments, politicians, the Russians and the Chinese? Yes.
I don’t buy the Russian, Ukrainian, Europe’s or American propaganda about this war, they are all lying. The US deep state has lied repeatedly to the American people and got us into numerous wars in which all we do is bled and die and never win.
After decades of this and the deep state openly declaring war on conservatives after they elected Trump in 2016 they trot out the Russian boogie man and many conservatives lap up their lies like starving dogs and believe every word they utter, it’s amazing to watch!
People who have caught the FBI/DOJ/IRS/ATF lying again and scoff at anything these agencies say will turn around and believe ANYTHING the CIA/NSA/DNI/DOD says as gospel from the Lord himself. It’s an amazing thing to watch the sheer control and power of these agencies have over their avowed political enemies!
I don’t support the Ukrainians or the Russians, it’s none of our business. That being said the warmongers will have their war and we will be lucky to live through their never ending quest for more spilled blood.
Not surprisingly, you did not answer my question.
So, I’ll ask it again: Do you refer to those who support Russia’s invasion of a smaller and weaker nation warmongers, as well?
Simple question, that only requires a simple answer: Yes or No.
Russia shouldn’t have invaded. Ivan is cloddish in his behavior and always has been. There are numerous reasons on both sides argued to support the Russian invasion and to argue against it. There is a lot of fingers in the dirty piggy bank that is the Ukraine on both sides. As to your question which you vehemently want an answer to the answer is yes, both sides need to stand down and negotiate an end to the war. It’s the wrong war, wrong place and wrong time for the US to engage in a third world war when we don’t need too.
Does the line Russia invading a smaller country make the west’s warmongers desire for WWIII more palatable or is this for propaganda purposes?
“As to your question which you vehemently want an answer to the answer is yes...”
Now, that wasn’t so hard, was it?
“Does the line Russia invading a smaller country make the west’s warmongers desire for WWIII more palatable or is this for propaganda purposes?”
Strawman argument. It has nothing at all to do with whether those who support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are warmongers (which, you now admit, they are). Yet, you single out the “west’s warmongers” for their “desire” for WWIII, yet you say nothing about the pro-Russia warmongers having the same desire. Why is that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.