Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: teeman8r; All
The court has noticed the Trump lawyers are not asserting declassification but are suggesting the DOJ has to prove they were not declassified.

I don’t understand the move if Trump had a standing order or had unreviewable authority to deem it so declassified in any manner.

7 posted on 09/21/2022 7:55:48 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Giant meteor 2022!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey

They are tap-dancing on the issue and no one wants to stick his law license on something Trump said he did. I am beginning to believe that that they don’t have the paperwork for these files.


24 posted on 09/21/2022 8:27:37 AM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

a standing order is usually written down once at least...

but a president taking files home can be assuming he is declassifying them. but assumptions in law are bad.


25 posted on 09/21/2022 8:33:51 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

“I don’t understand the move...”

Well, if the DOJ is looking to prosecute, as they have revealed that they are, then the onus is on them to prove that a crime was even committed, even before they have to try and prove that Trump committed a crime. To assert that Trump declassified the documents is to make an assertion of fact and that puts the onus on Trump’s lawyers to prove the assertion. Essentially they would be making the state’s case much easier if they did that.


33 posted on 09/21/2022 9:51:42 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson