Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CatHerd

That might have not happened if we hadn’t passed the 17th Amendment and turned Senators into publicity seeking political careerists. In the older system States through their appointed senators would not have wanted to give up their power & influence. One the 17th was passed the state as an institution could be ignored. After the 17th a senator was now nothing more than just a congressman-at-large. The state corporately meant nothing it was just a corral to keep voters in.

I wish I still had this but some FReeper researched and show that prior to the passage of the 17th Amendment there were very few multiterm senators. Probably the reason being that state legislators saw themselves eventually in that seat as did other state grandees, so there was state internal competition.


44 posted on 09/19/2022 7:54:21 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Reily

Excellent point and analysis. Well done!


48 posted on 09/19/2022 7:59:12 AM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Reily; CatHerd

Subordination of the States was inherent in the Constitution as George Mason and Patrick Henry warned. Lincoln made this total. The 17th Amendment contributed but wasn’t the cause


85 posted on 09/19/2022 10:28:44 AM PDT by Pelham (World War III is entering on cat's feet. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson