Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1

Why does it have to be framed as a religious issue? If a person did not want to be subjected to an experimental gene therapy, that should be enough to prevent companies from mandating medical procedures.

If a future jab is created without a link to the cells from abortions, would the religious objection argument failed in courts?


7 posted on 08/19/2022 10:54:56 PM PDT by nosf40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nosf40

Exactly.

An employer can take whatever precautions they want up to but not going beyond our bodily integrity. They can no more require the vx than they can require me to bend over and let the boss sodomize me.


9 posted on 08/19/2022 10:57:42 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Cv19 vaccines are Phase 2 of the CCP bioweapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: nosf40

Agree! It is a personal choice!


10 posted on 08/19/2022 11:21:33 PM PDT by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: nosf40

It was framed as a religious issue because that is what the lawsuit was about. There is no job on earth worth losing my salvation over


12 posted on 08/20/2022 1:38:51 AM PDT by roving ( Pronouns- libs/suk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: nosf40

Not so much a religious issue as a liberty issue. The court came to the right conclusion.


14 posted on 08/20/2022 7:09:37 AM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Biden regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson