BINGO!!
Instead of the big bang, Heim talks about the ‘big leap’. After all, the expansion of the metron with concurrent surface splits happens in quantum leaps in an initially absolutely empty universe, and that by means of the enlargement of the space diameter by one length quantum per time quantum.
In Einstein’s general theory of relativity, in contrast, the big bang, as proved by Stephen Hawking, is a necessity. Because in the field equations – as we have already seen – the geometry of space is only defined when a density of energy or matter is present. Thus, at the beginning of the world all matter of space would have had to exist compressed in a volume smaller than a pinhead. What matter geometrically means and how it was created, however, cannot be stated.
In Heim’s theory, however, there is only the dynamics of a pure geometry. Its state equations don’t contain any phenomenological quantities anymore. The thing we call matter appears in the universe only much later (approximately 10 to the power 100 years later), and then not in one single explosion, but, put figuratively, almost concurrently “as a kind of firework” all over the universe as soon as the number of area quanta is big enough and their areas small enough (as soon as it has about double the value of today’s area element), so that the broken symmetry of the Poincaré group and the creation of matter can come about. That happened only about 14 to 20 billion years ago.
Matter entered space in the form of quanta of the Planck masses, i.e. about 10-5 grams, and accumulated in quasars. The cosmologic background radiation is explained in the same way as in the modern Quasi Steady State Theory, and not as the residual radiation of a big bang.
#8: Thank you!
In before, “6 days!” appears.
I have often thought that the background radiation could/should be explained in other ways than big bang origin. But it fit the narrative so. . .
I like to compare it to the formation snow from a water vapor cloud.