Posted on 08/16/2022 3:09:11 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy
Now go for it! Hound your congresscritters and senators, especially those who are on the Go8 committee.
Why were they not informed? Or were they? And if they were not informed why have they not raised H-ll with the FBI director and the AG?
The New York Times and Washington Post published classified information in the 1970s.
The FBI didn’t bust into Katherine Gramham’s house.
Another perfectly reasonable analysis which is meaningless to these scoundrels.
I’m still chewing on they just threw out 27% Of signed votes in LA.
But that wasn’t an insurrection or voting rights violation, and aren’t they even against requiring signatures?
Incredible.
Hound congressmen and senators, especially those on the Gañg of 8 committee.
Why were they not informed?
Or were they?
And if they were not informed why have they not raised Hell with the FBI director and the AG?
Solid, reasonable piece. Sundance does it again.
Poorly written, but the author is correct.
How about talking about Joe Biden sending top-grade weapons to Ukraine with the same software that the US military uses.
There was no time to rewrite and test software specially crafted for export to Ukraine.
The Russians are bound to capture some examples.
The Russians will trade their captured knowledge for sanction busting products from China.
TALKING POINTS......
——there is the legislative branch oversight mechanism known as the Gang-of-Eight.
——Whenever the executive branch runs into a conflict that involves sensitivity within an issue they define as “national security,”
-——the executive branch is supposed to use the tool of the legislative branch to extricate themselves from the conflict.
-——the DOJ/FBI could have briefed the Go8 on the nature of the sensitive ‘national security’ issue,
-——this bipartisan briefing to both democrats and republicans removes Main Justice from the appearance of political impropriety.
If, later on, the nature of their investigation is ever questioned, Main Justice (the representatives of the executive branch) have the shield of telling the American public that congress was notified.
Any word from the “count every vote” crowd on the LA signature toss scam?
There should have been enough information (name, address) to individually ask the voters who had their petition requests uncounted.
Maybe petition signature collectors should become licensed public notaries.
legal beagle.com
Warrant Requirement
Under the Fourth Amendment, any government-conducted search requires issuance of a search warrant by a court. A valid search warrant must state “with particularity” the place to be searched and the items being sought in the search. The judge who issues the warrant must also be “neutral and detached,” meaning that the judge has no reason or incentive to issue the warrant beyond the evidence presented in the warrant application.
Probable Cause
Courts issue search warrants based on a finding of probable cause to search. Probable cause to search exists when, based on all information presented by the law enforcement officer to the court, the court has reason to believe that the location to be searched will contain evidence of commission of a crime, or the fruits of that crime. Probable cause is also temporal; the object of the search must be likely to be found there at the approximate time at which the search will take place.
Staleness
A search conducted pursuant to a valid warrant may still be found illegal if the warrant is improperly executed. Officers who execute the search warrant cannot exceed the warrant’s scope, meaning that they cannot search areas outside the scope of the warrant. Officers also may not wait too long between issuance of the warrant and execution (unless the delay is reasonable), or the warrant will be “stale”. A stale search warrant is subject to challenge by the defendant as no longer supported by probable cause. Analysis of staleness takes into account subjective factors, but courts generally find search warrants stale 10 days after issuance.
Anticipatory Warrants
Staleness analysis changes slightly in the context of anticipatory warrants. A court grants an anticipatory warrant when an object is not yet on the premises to be searched, but will be there at some future point in time. An anticipatory warrant must be executed at that future point in time. Officers use anticipatory warrants when, for instance, they expect the defendant to receive a package containing contraband on a specific future date. Because anticipatory warrants, by their very nature, imply some delay in execution, courts will often analyze the staleness of anticipatory warrants on a case-by-case basis.
I will call Senator Johnson’s office in the AM. In the meantime I will C&P this piece to his e-mail.
I’m sure he’s well aware of all of this. Me calling Senator Baldwin (D, Gay, WI) has always been a waste of time and effort. Dark Money bought WI this worthless, ineffective LOSER.
This is all making me SO uncomfortable. I love my Country, but how I LOATHE my Government! *SPIT*
Praying for President in Exile Trump!
I’ve heard about it! Amazing?!
But, please, go for this issue. Spread the info, ask the questions. Make life uncomfortable for the swamp dwellers.
Why?
The Gang of 8 is Deep State.
And if they were not informed why have they not raised Hell with the FBI director and the AG?
*************
They simply don’t care.
The only thing they care about is protecting the Swamp.
“Why were they not informed? Or were they? And if they were not informed why have they not raised H-ll with the FBI director and the AG?“
A: - because ALL of them want Trump GONE for good. They all colluded to oust him from the White House in 2020 and they HATE that he’s still around.
99.9% of DC will stop at NOTHING to “cut off the head”… (WE are the ‘body’).
This is about US as much as him.
Get them to state that, in that case. Make life a little more uncomfortable for them by raising a very sensible question.
Exactly! One way, or, the other....they SHOULD be raising h3ll!!!
The GO8, if it still exists, most likely will be peopled exclusively by those with the “correct” political and geopolitical views...
Good point by Sundance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.