That’s a good reason to think otherwise, isn’t it?
No, because we have no other reason to think they've changed the formulation and the FDA didn't approve them.
And what makes you think no one is doing quality control and monitoring these batches? The FDA-mandated manufacturing processes for pharmaceuticals are rigorous and subject to constant audit.
As to the VAERS data, one simple explanation could be a big difference in the populations receiving the various batches. Nursing home patients vs. healthcare workers vs. first responders vs. teenagers, etc.
“No, because we have no other reason to think they’ve changed the formulation and the FDA didn’t approve them.”
So more deaths in one batch vs another is not a good reason?
This could still be investigated assuming some of the batches have samples preserved for just such an eventuality.
“And what makes you think no one is doing quality control and monitoring these batches? The FDA-mandated manufacturing processes for pharmaceuticals are rigorous and subject to constant audit.”
What makes you think the FDA didn’t approve difference batch “recipes”?
The FDA gave authorization to a vaccine that does not do the job, and, indeed could never do the job. What makes you think the FDA wasn’t subject to political pressure to let Pfizer do whatever they wanted?
We could find out if we checked. Why not?
“As to the VAERS data, one simple explanation could be a big difference in the populations receiving the various batches.”
Yes, it could be an explanation, but why dont we know for sure? We don’t know and so your explanation is no better than the original posters claims of vaccine injury.
There is a reason we don’t know.