Covid is over, but we still do not have the data to assess if the vax injures people. So we are left with anecdotes.
That is the point. You cannot legitimately criticize those dooming on vaccines without data on both sides.
That is my problem with your commentary. You are right to be skeptical of the stories without proof, but it is likewise correct to be skeptical of the vax until the extent and frequency of injuries (if any) can be assessed with data.
The “all cause mortality” is especially disturbing. It needs scientific assessment but it is lacking. You seem to want to gloss over that and I do not think you have the data to comment as you have in a critical way against anecdotes. You sound like you are learned enough to grasp good vs flawed data.
A list of people someone says died is not good data, I agree, but likewise you seem to say “it didn’t happen” which deserves equal skepticism to “some guy making claims on the internet”
I think concern over vax injury is warranted. I think it’s valid to question why data is now not collected, compiled differently than before, or simply not released.
Yes. Covid is over. Vaccines were failures based on claims made about their efficacy. Some significant problems are coming to light on their safety. Yet there is little interest from govt to investigate in a rigorous, scientific way.
Why?
I think you exhibit a bias against investigating vax problems. I don’t think we have data to support any bias one way or another, but we should have it.
Thanks for the back-and-forth and I am interested in your opinion, even though I am critical of some of your apparent conclusions.
See 18.
What data are you thinking of? What's different with the data available about the Covid vaccines vs. previous ones?