These were the reported totals on the 4th.
“There are vote totals for each of the selected candidates. 143K R votes were cast. 254k D votes were cast. That’s a total of 397k votes. So of that total, 64% were Dems (254/397)”
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4082842/posts?page=239#239
I suppose my source was no good —by the 5th (the following day), the R votes increased by more than 300k while the D votes only by 6k.
Agreed, my numbers don’t square.
Numbers from that night:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4082750/posts?page=306#306
Would you expect a ballot measure to have a significantly higher vote count than the combined count for a US Senate seat — by let’s say 25% ?
Gene, thanks for getting back with me.
You said Would you expect a ballot measure to have a significantly higher vote count than the combined count for a US Senate seat — by let’s say 25% ?
Normally, one would not expect to see that type of stat.
Unfortunately, the Dems got alot of "unaffiliated" voters to the polls to vote NO. Normally, one would not expect to see many unaffiliated voters show up on primary day, since they cannot vote on either Rep or Dem candidates. But the pro-aborts were fired up like a bunch of angry hornets and swarmed the polls in far greater number than anyone anticipated.
I hope they don't show up in Nov to re-elect pro-abort extremist Laura Kelly for governor.