Oh - so it's your blog...
What difference does that make? The article spins this as some new information that has "now debunked" a story that was actually debunked over a year ago. The medical examiner publicly confirmed this, which is better evidence than double hearsay text messages that were almost certainly just repeating what was said by the medical examiner anyway.
Even freaking left-wing Snopes said the fire extinguisher sorry was false way back in February of last year.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brian-sicknick-fire-extinguisher/
Pretending that this story was only debunked by these text messages, when the text messages themselves simply repeat information that was publicly available more than 16 months ago - is a joke.
FR is becoming blog-pimp central.
1 - From the article. "The mother of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, who died shortly after the infamous mob riot at the Capitol, told the Daily Mail that he did not die from being struck on the head by a fire extinguisher."
2 - From the article, different paragraph. Former Capitol Cop Edward Travis Page provided proof that he's legit — shared texts that he says are from Brian Sicknick, blaming “Antifa” on January 6th. — says that January 6th committee witnesses LIMITED in what they're allowed to say (i.e. can't give both sides)
You owe ConservativeMind an apology!