This reminds me of the contests between horses and trains when trains first started to become popular.
Conservatives do not need to be against electric, only the attempt by leftists to “force” it on us.
“Conservatives do not need to be against electric, only the attempt by leftists to “force” it on us.”
Agreed. Let the superior technology win.
how is reporting the truth about EVs being against them?
the facts are the facts
I’m not opposed to electric vehicles per second if they are used for what they are good for. (Quick acceleration and short distance.) For long trips and travel away from population centers petrol fuels are needed. I am convinced the push to EVs is an attempt to tie the population to those population centers
I agree on that count. I am not anti-electric. Just like I am not anti-wind or anti-solar.
I am anti-”being forced to accept inferior technology for all the wrong reasons”.
With a simple federal law REQUIRING so-called “green” technology to obtain ALL its inputs from certifiable “green” sources, the cost differential would be equitably apparent. If EV cars had to refuel by ONLY solar or wind-generated electricity, owners would be subjected to the actual cost of their advocacy.
“Conservatives do not need to be against electric, only the attempt by leftists to “force” it on us.”
The car companies are trying to force it on us as well.
I hope their executives drive the things and get stuck on the highway in the middle of nowhere on a cold winter night—they earned it.