With the Biden administration trying to force the competition between men and women in the same sport, while trying to utilize title IX, is a blatant inaccuracy. And in time, I hope people understand the problem.
Title IX is the most commonly used name for the federal civil rights law in the United States of America that was passed as part (Title IX) of the Education Amendments of 1972. It prohibits sex-based discrimination in any school or any other education program that receives funding from the federal government.
“There are civil rights act discrimination which is pretty broad.”
Through time, much broader than was intended. And as the concessions to different groups are being administered, it becomes an enemy to itself. When the rule fell into sports, and moving from prohibiting sex-based discrimination in any school or any other education program that receives funding from the federal government to trying to create a false position of financial protection based upon gender only for program existence.
So if it is being used to protect women’s programs, how can men be allowed to compete in women’s only programs based upon funding. Oops! So for that later addition of interpretation, allowing men and women competing together does not need title IX as there is no gender protection to be needed.
But that’s where the problems start. It’s going to get worse in time. As the reality of same sex sports starts to dissipate with the inclusion of all sports to all genders, what is the government funding going to be used for if it is earmarked for gender responsibility that no longer exists? Probably still be going to some little country for their military arms they won’t or can’t pay for.
wy69
That is my point.
There is constitutional points of discrimination and then are are the rest.
employment
education,
others?
We need to force this back to the highest authority.
But no such distinction is necessary. As I have pointed out in my many articles on discrimination:
Discrimination is neither a dirty word nor an evil deed.
There is no right to service.
Discriminating against someone is not aggressing against him.
To outlaw discrimination is to outlaw freedom of thought and freedom of association.
A free society is not free of discrimination, but a free society is free of discrimination laws.
A free society must include the freedom to discriminate against any individual or group, on any basis, for any reason.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/09/laurence-m-vance/is-discrimination-constitutional/