Q is back!!!!

EEE | 24 JUNE 2022 | EEE

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "the identity of Q is widely known now"

oh? Who is they?

[Observator]

Yes, it was a they. Two main authors - initially a guy from S. Africa named Paul Furber. By early 2018 Ron Watkins had taken over the account.

There were always clues suggesting the authors, and Watkins admitted at one point writing as Q. Watkins and Furber were some of the earliest promoters. The most definitive proof though is a form of computer linguistic analysis with an accuracy rate in the high 90s.

Perhaps coincidental with Q's return, Watkins is running for Congress.

[CatHerd]

All correct!

Paul Furber himself has come out and said the new Q is Jim Watkins:

https://gab.com/paulf/posts/108540899126218562

And yet Q followers are claiming that according to their numerology hocus pocus that Furber magically knew when he made his first LARP post as Q on 4chan that Watkins would post as Q exactly 1700 days later on 8kun after a long Q hiatus. (See post #55 on this thread.)

Looks like Jim & Ron want to restart their grift machine. Funny how Q followers say “follow the money” except when it comes to the Q grifters and antivaxx grifters.

It’s so obvious Jim is behind the “new Q”. He turns on TOR and waits for SCOTUS to rule on Roe v Wade. And the Q followers lap it up and claim this is “proof” Q is “real”.

Jim Watkins claims new Q is legit of course:

https://media.greatawakening.win/post/WlFjZ4QDhK1P.jpeg

A few of the smarter Q followers are skeptical, though. On Discord:

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/750796879155167386/990430065596715040/Untitled.png

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/750796879155167386/990430123671027732/Untitled2.png

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/750796879155167386/990430174308884491/Untitled3.png

It’s both funny and sad to see the mental gymnastics the True Believer Q followers go through to rationalize all this. But I suppose it’s comforting to them to imagine there is some vast evil conspiracy that is being bested by the mighty Q and Superhero Trump, so it’s not all bad. (The real world is chaotic and unpredictable. No human, nor any human organization, is ultimately in control, and that’s downright scary.) There are other psychological benefits as well, of course.

[Observator]

You know your subject well :)

To be honest, I can see how riding that train could be exciting and invigorating - like a whole new way of seeing the world.

[Captainpaintball]

No. I was in probation status at my work, and worked 60 hours a week. I never attended a rally, or, hell, a local sporting event in that time. Come to think of it, I barely left the house unless it was to go to the store or work, I was so tired. I guarantee most people aren't in that situation, especially with all the hours they waste looking at that Q crap. Retirees have even more time to do that kind of stuff. And if we need muscle, we ORGANIZE and donate $$$ to hire that muscle. It would have been great to have some people smash some windows in philadelphia while corey lewandowski and kelly anne CONway were impotently crying about how unfair it was that they weren't allowed in to watch the poll watchers. Instead, we were told to sit back and not get involved because something big was happening. Which it wasn't.

And SHAME on Trump for flirting with that shit. He literally helped the enemy by legitimizing it. What was he trying to accomplish there?

[mbrfl]

So your answer is no, just as I thought. A lot of whining about others not doing enough, but still no. And shame on you for saying “shame on Trump” only two days after Roe v Wade was overturned thanks to Trump.

“It would have been great to have some people smash some windows in philadelphia while corey lewandowski and kelly anne CONway were impotently crying about how unfair it was that they weren’t allowed in to watch the poll watchers.”

I see what you did there. You just switched from criticizing Q to criticizing Kellyanne and Corey, and hoping no one will notice. Then your next step is to criticize Trump, who publicly said virtually nothing about Q, and try to lump them all together without coming right out and saying so. It’s obvious that you’re not so much anti-Q as you are anti-Trump.

I’m going to go out on a very short limb and guess that you didn’t vote for Trump in 2016, or at the very least you held your nose and voted for him after fighting his nomination and whining about up till election day.

[coop71]

This is the wisest, most accurate, and most insightful post I’ve seen around here in a long, long time.

[Pelham]

Yes, the identity of Q is widely known now

this guy gets my vote

[Captainpaintball]

I voted for Trump twice. Three, if you count the primary, even though it was a done deal at that point. He was a MAJOR disappointment in my opinion. and likely the last best hope at saving the country. And he BLEW it. There's likely no coming back from a Biden presidency. And it's because they stole it. And they stole it because Trump did NOTHING abut voter fraud. And he fell for the COVID19 lie.

I see what you did there.

I don't know how you "see" anything with your head up your ass, but enjoy this news article and this video of Trump glorifying Q.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-qanon-conspiracy-theory-first-time

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/08/01/qanon-trump-rally-foreman-lead-pkg-vpx.cnn

[Observator]

Hale Bopp! LOL-blast from the past!

My uncle saw the whole group in a restaurant in the late 90s- apparently they all wore the same sneakers and all ordered chicken pot pies.

[mbrfl]

“I voted for Trump twice. Three, if you count the primary, even though it was a done deal at that point. He was a MAJOR disappointment in my opinion. and likely the last best hope at saving the country. And he BLEW it.”

“I don’t know how you “see” anything with your head up your ass,”

Well I obviously did see correctly about one thing - that your anti-Q feelings are really just anti-Trump feelings in disguise. But to your credit you don’t appear to be peddling some RINO line like “we should have elected a real Conservative like Ted Cruz”, or something of that ilk. If Trump couldn’t get it done then there’s nobody else who could’ve. On that point we agree. Where we disagree is that the war is over. The past 1 1/2 years under Biden have sucked. But war sucks, and we’re at war.

Do you really think Trump doesn’t understand what the Dems were up to 2 years ago? When have you ever seen Trump walk away from a fight? And now, for the first time in his life he just lets traitors get away with stealing the election? It makes no sense. And that, amongst other reasons, is why I don’t believe it.

It may be hard to imagine why it might have been necessary to lose the election battle before we could win the war. But Trump knows, and knew back then, more about the situation than either of us. And he’s not someone who would just roll over, unless it was a tactic.

[Captainpaintball]

WHY WOULD IT BE NECESSARY TO LOSE THE ELECTION TO WIN A WAR? WHAT ON EARTH ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WE MAY NOT SURVIVE UNTIL 2022!!! EXPLAIN THIS GARBAGE TO ME!!!

[mbrfl]

Before we start, here’s a suggestion. Calm down.

As far as why it might be necessary to lose the election to win the war? There are a few possibilities but try this one on. Maybe in order to fully expose the network of traitors who have infiltrated our government, it was necessary to let them commit treason first. And that means, not only those who were directly involved in the election theft, but also those in Congress and the bureaucracy that knew about the theft and did nothing to stop it or lied about it. What if what we’re seeing has been a sting operation? There are a lot of reasons to suppose that might be the case.

Further suppose that certain things could better be accomplished from the outside rather than the inside. Perhaps, as much as catching the conspirators in the act of treason, it was important to let the country see the Democrat’s corruption directly by having to live through a Biden administration for a period of time. Convincing Dem voters that their party and leadership are corrupt would have been a lot harder with Trump in power. Now that they are nominally in power and are causing such havoc, it’s a much easier case to make. The last 1 1/2 years has been all them. They can’t credibly blame anyone but themselves Even most die hard liberals are having a hard time backing this administration. The latest polls show that even Democrat voters are starting to question whether the election was really secure.

If you’re committed to being angry, then dismiss those possibilities. But if you’d like to think outside the box and at least consider those possibilities you might find they makes sense. And as a side benefit, you might find you’re less bitter and you might be able to see that the tide has already started to turn and take some encouragement from that. But like I said, if you’ve made a commitment to being angry....

[Captainpaintball]

https://nypost.com/2022/06/28/former-senate-sergeant-at-arms-michael-stenger-dies/

The ONE guy in the Capitol police that knew the truth (He was the one that said the assault was done by professional agitators) was now likely murdered.

The best way to expose TREASON is to BE IN POWER. Or else those trying to expose it DIE, you dope.

And you can not get back in power when the FRAUD is so rampant and they will have had FOUR YEARS to perfect it. No more 4:30 "F-graph" shenanigans in Wisconsin. The algorithm will be improved to hide all traces of fraud in real time, from the beginning. They are no longer scared.

it was important to let the country see the Democrat’s corruption

Go on twitter. The democrats can admit to killing republicans and conservatives, and 65% of democrats/nonwhite/poor/urban shitizens will support it. As long as the 'bortion-ers get their 'bortions, and the hominid class git they "gibsmedats" they DO NOT CARE.

You are delusional.

[bagster]

Paul Furber himself has come out and said the new Q is Jim Watkins:

Haha. Paul Furber? Yea, he's about as credible as all the other debunked Q debunkers. And as credible as you, no offense.

Keep trying. You're a spunky one.

[CatHerd]

Nah. See my #75 again for the reason. Also see what Heinlein had to say about the teaching of singing and what Shaw said about wrestling. Have a nice day :)

[bagster]

Good. It’s a cesspool of child porn and sick violence, populated by neo-Nazis, unhinged incels and glorifiers of mass shootings.

Yea, anybody can post on 8chan/kun, and the enemy takes full advantage. Too bad you people take the bait so easily.

The true 'anons' are patriots and they sussed out a treasure trove of open source information under Q's guidance, all while the enemy attempted to shut them down and accuse them of being child pornographers and nazi's. Just like you did.

You do the enemy's work. Are you even aware of that?

[bagster]

Those who know Q is fake, get attacked by the true believers.

Nobody knows Q is fake, least of all a nerdling like you.

No offense.

[Widget Jr]

From your account, no offense is taken.

Those who figured out Q was fake, because one of the people who created Q explained how they did it, know Q is fake.

James Brower has given interviews explaining how Q was created.
The owners of 4/8chan were caught posting as Q.
Q "influencers" were outed as phonies.

When those who created the hoax explain the hoax, are caught participating it in, etc, that is evidence of a hoax.

[9YearLurker]

God, help us.