4 minutes, 53 seconds
0:00
generally in discussing the subject of
0:02
voter fraud courts adopt a principle
0:06
that is called the but for principle and
0:09
the but for principle simply says
0:11
but for this fraud
0:13
would the election outcome have been
0:15
different that becomes a critical
0:17
question so for example if the fraud is
0:19
minor and wouldn’t have made a
0:21
difference even if it could be proved
0:23
courts are likely to say well it’s it’s
0:25
moot it doesn’t really matter even if
0:27
this were true it would not have uh
0:29
changed the outcome of the election but
0:31
this is not what we’re dealing with in
0:33
2000 meals because the claim is advanced
0:35
in the movie with
0:37
a lot of supporting evidence
0:39
that we are talking about an enormous
0:41
magnitude
0:43
of a fraud so
0:45
the question is when that’s the case
0:47
when you can meet the but four standard
0:50
can an election result be overturned
0:53
well as it turns out the answer to that
0:55
question is obviously yes
0:57
in 2018 an election was overturned
1:02
in north carolina now interestingly in
1:04
that case which by the way is mentioned
1:06
in the movie the fraud was on behalf of
1:09
a republican candidate now it was done
1:10
by a democratic operative the fraud was
1:12
actually organized by a guy named mccray
1:14
dallas a guy recently died the late
1:17
mcrae dallas and this is a guy who
1:19
worked for kind of a black
1:21
uh left-wing
1:23
group called the blade and improvement
1:25
association and he learned all his
1:27
tactics of ballot trafficking and paying
1:30
guys uh and on doing all kinds of
1:32
shenanigans he learned it from the
1:34
democrats but then he had a fight with
1:35
them he broke with them they refused to
1:36
hire him something like that so he took
1:38
his services to a republican candidate
1:41
mark harris
1:42
and
1:43
and that then resulted in harris winning
1:46
the election narrowly but when there was
1:48
an investigation there were admissions
1:51
that came out of that and the election
1:53
result was overturned overturned by the
1:55
way not by a court but by the elections
1:57
board and then there was a new election
1:59
harris decided not to run again another
2:01
guy named dan bishop ran on the
2:03
republican ticket he won the election
2:05
and so that’s what happened but the
2:07
reason i mention all this is because it
2:09
simply doesn’t follow that we are stuck
2:11
with a kind of fade accompli a done deal
2:13
that somehow because it’s happened
2:14
nothing can be done it’s not true and
2:16
things can be done and things have been
2:18
done uh and and um
2:21
and um so
2:23
uh but the way that they are done is not
2:26
simply because some people come up to me
2:27
they go dinesh well you know will the
2:29
supreme court be like watching your
2:30
movie are they gonna take up the
2:32
evidence in the movie and that’s of
2:34
course not how it works the way it works
2:36
is that you have an investigation
2:39
by the way there is one going on in yuma
2:42
there’s another one going on in
2:44
georgia but somebody steps up to the
2:46
plate somebody takes the necessary steps
2:48
somebody arrests the mule somebody uh
2:51
asks them to fess up um and makes them
2:54
fess up who paid you who put you up to
2:57
this who organized all this and you work
2:59
your way through investigation your and
3:02
the legal investigation essentially
3:04
picks up where the movie leaves off and
3:06
then what you have is a criminal cartel
3:09
a criminal cartel organized by the left
3:11
and and by the democrats and that’s the
3:14
way it then makes its way into judicial
3:17
proceedings and courts
3:19
of course the republicans will have an
3:20
opportunity themselves uh if they take
3:23
the house and the senate to have
3:24
hearings about all this so this this is
3:26
in no way
3:28
going away
3:30
the left is trying to make it go away
3:31
and they’re trying to make it go away
3:32
with their usual tactics i kind of
3:34
laughed today i saw an article in the
3:36
bulwark now the bullwork is like bill
3:38
crystal’s never trump enterprise and
3:41
they found some you know being bat this
3:44
is amanda carpenter ball state
3:47
university grad
3:48
who apparently learned at ball state not
3:51
reasoning skills or analytical skills
3:53
none of that is in evidence in the
3:54
article but you could call it a certain
3:56
kind of sarcastic petulance a certain
3:58
kind of performance artistry um and and
4:02
that’s what that’s what the whole review
4:04
is it’s just basically yeah this is a
4:06
wacky movie it’s it’s it’s for gullible
4:09
whack jobs who want to cough up money um
4:12
as if this is any kind of rebuttal this
4:15
is this is basically the never trumpers
4:17
playing to the liberal choir so that
4:20
liberal money can keep flowing into
4:22
their pockets i mean these people it’s
4:24
not just that they’re it’s not just that
4:26
they’re indignant about trump they’ve
4:27
gone that was their original emotion but
4:30
these are careerists they’re
4:32
opportunists they’re people of low
4:33
talent who have not been able to be
4:35
successful in their own right and so
4:37
they figured out that the cultural
4:39
powers on the left there are lots of
4:41
liberal billionaires willing to fund
4:44
nominal republicans who will take on the
4:46
right and so ultimately they’re in it
4:49
in part for the careerism and mostly for
4:52
the money
2000 meals?
“These are careerists, they’re opportunists, they’re people of low talent…”
Ha ha!