Posted on 05/03/2022 5:41:16 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
Eight percent (43 of 537) of patients underwent a biopsy; 34 (79%) had benign results (Fig 2) and nine (21%) had malignant results (Table E2 [online]). Four patients were diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (Fig E1 [online]); all had suspicious concurrent mammographic findings in the ipsilateral breast. Four patients were diagnosed with lymphoma; three patients already had known diagnoses, and the fourth patient presented with bilateral lymphadenopathy (Fig E2 [online]). One patient with a known history of lung cancer was diagnosed with lung cancer metastatic to an axillary lymph node.
So they had breast cancer (all new), lymphoma (one new), and lung cancer (thought to be under control or gone from prior treatment, but it went metastatic).
Obviously the known cancer cases were not seen to be influenced by the shot, but the rest were novel after it. Obviously, new cases will come, regardless of shots, but only 8 percent of those with inflamed lymph nodes were tested. Therefore, it is likely more of those with inflamed nodes could also have malignancy.
this means you cannot trust the government
Well, obviously only 8% had suspicious masses found on the mammogram that indicated biopsy was in order and the rest did not (swollen nodes caused by something else like vaccine or infection in the other 92%). I suppose it’s possible a tiny fraction could have incipient cancer that would not show up on a mammogram yet, but that says nothing about the vaccine, right?
How do you know the cancer only showed up right after the vaccine? They don’t break it out in the MedicalXpress piece. If you want to switch to another study, would you be so kind as to post a link so I can see the whole thing? I can’t tell from the excerpt how many were or weren’t vaccinated, whether this was broken out or what.
Israel — where I count records-keeping and government transparency (as least on the coronapanic) to be more credible — they’re reporting 60% of all the vaccinated have side effects from the vaccine.
Thanks. If I’m reading it right (tired tonight), all 1217 had been vaccinated, and 9 had malignant results, or about 0.74%. Given that women getting mammograms are at higher risk (age, felt a lump, family history), is this out of the ordinary? I don’t know. I’m not a doctor.
Okay, yes, it matches up with the study you linked, so not out of the ordunary:
“A small percentage of women, according to the American Cancer Society, are called back for additional tests following their initial mammogram. Ten percent of women return and of that percentage only 8 to 10 percent are biopsied. Eighty percent of biopsies come back benign.”
https://www.independentimaging.com/what-percentage-of-diagnostic-mammograms-is-cancer/
The Vax Covidians are keywording all these damning articles again.
There is NOTHING, no matter how diligently researched, documented, peer reviewed, and published, that any of them would accept as evidence of the destructive nature and serious side effects of these useless, EUA injections.
I guess they have sold their souls for some pretty good vax shill pay.
So where are all the other similar reports of this complication and recommendation concerning mammograms with all the real vaccines women have been getting for years?
Seems I’ve missed this warning when it came to thee annual flu shots.
You misspelled “not”.
Probably a basement dweller with nothing better to do than to stalk $hot warning threads.
Hmm.. do you know if hearing-related problems is common with vaxx? Cow-orker’s father is reporting severe hearing loss and vertigo post-vaxx.
Several FReepers, who’ve had these $hots, have reported the same. Both hearing and vertigo issues.
“That’s just .1%!”
8 / 1000 = .008 or .8%
If you read the link I provided in that post, you will see this:
Answer from radiologist Elizabeth Edney, MD:
Temporary lymph node swelling after receiving the COVID-19 or flu vaccine is a normal, expected reaction.”
... and you can go to the site and continue reading if you wish.
Its recommended to get the mammogram first, then get vaccine (any vaccine, flu, whatever) if possible, but not to delay mammogram if vaccination needed before mammogram:
Apparently the Covid vaccines are more likely than flu vaccines to cause swollen lymph nodes, but it’s recommended to get mammogram before flu shot (or other vaccine) as flu vaccines can also cause this.
You can do your own internet search and find more.
That would be a rate of 1.6% - 2.0% for cancer for normal times, which the study matches. This is something the study should have brought out!
The 44% inflamed lymph issue appears to be worse than normal.
Thank you for finding a comparison for the findings!
Thank you! It’s been a pleasure discussing this you. It’s like old times on FR when we bounced questions off each other, researched, found answers together. I never would have discovered that had you not brought up the question.
Yes, it certainly does look like the Covid vaccines are much more likely than flu vaccines to cause adenopathy, and 44% is a very high rate.
I would guess the study was more aimed at whether the high rate of adenopathy after vaccination affected diagnostics, but it looks like it does not, as about the same percentage of women were called back for more testing as before the Covid vaccines, and same percentage were found to have cancer or benign tumor.
Anyway, with so much information and “information” out there about the vaccines, it’s hard to figure out what is a real concern vs. what is not. So far, it looks like cardiomyopathy in young men, while fairly rare, is a real concern. Now we know breast cancer is not. It’s nice to discuss and discover with someone like you who is interested in the facts and finding out what is real vs. what is hype.
You do a great service here on FR with your “take charge of your own health” posts. I really appreciate it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.