One caveat is that Jack Shafer seems to think that reporters won't accept the decisions of the Disinformation Police. I guess he overlooked the willingness of outlets such as MSNBC to embrace such decisions when conservative sources are cited as disinformation. In fact, I am sure that most at MSNBC would gladly act as Disinformation Police stenographers.
1 posted on
05/01/2022 7:35:47 AM PDT by
PJ-Comix
To: PJ-Comix
At the time this was first reported, my first reaction was that it stunk as misdirection.
Today I’m more convinced than ever that this is a distraction.
The obvious questions need not be listed, but it warrants continued vigilance.
3 posted on
05/01/2022 7:41:45 AM PDT by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
To: PJ-Comix
Any news organization that had to pay a settlement to Nick Sandmann is guilty of disinformation. And not to put too fine on point on it, but it’s intentional disinformation. That is, disinformation through intentional lying.
4 posted on
05/01/2022 8:25:48 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(My prediction: Harris is Spiro Agnew. We'll soon see who becomes Gerald Ford, and our next prez.)
To: PJ-Comix
WOKE TOTALITARIANS will make their move before the midterms.
6 posted on
05/01/2022 8:59:23 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Gumballs and illegals: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=45&v=LPjzfGChGlE)
To: PJ-Comix
7 posted on
05/01/2022 9:16:38 AM PDT by
sauropod
("We put all our politicians in prison as soon as they are elected. Don’t you?" Why? "It saves time.”)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson