So it was...well I guess I’ll post the same thing here I posted there:
The higher risk would actually be infinite - anything you do that may have side effects - even taking a Tylenol - is going to be higher of having said side effects by taking it vs. not taking something - you can’t have the potential side effects at all by not taking something so this headline has no sense to it.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2791253
There’s the actual study. “15x higher” of an extraordinarily rare occurring event in the study. This is headline sensationalism - typical of Gateway Pundit, of course.
Narrative above all else - truth and fact secondary to a good piece of propaganda.
anything you do that may have side effects - even taking a Tylenol
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Driving drunk can cause side effects including death. I don’t drive drunk and I don’t take trial drugs from a company that has been sued for billions because of faulty products.
JAMA LAMA!
Exactly so. The study does not say what posters here are acting like it says.
So letSoooo, there is a very small chance that we’re going to have another Cherobl (sp) in the next ten years, but if we do this thing, the chance is 15 times more that it will happen... you you see where you’re going with this why would we do that? Pretty ignorant it would seem.
Conclusion from the study:
Both first and second doses of mRNA vaccines were associated with increased risk of myocardial and pericarditis.
Seems pretty clear to me.