“I look at logic and common sense. Could it be Corona is NOT what they are fighting? Another , more serious plague has escaped their labs? Or some other deadly virus? Corona IS NOT DEADLY, proven. Heck, I am in my 60’s and a Pureblood ( not vaxed) , my son and I sailed through it, him 2 days fever, me, 5 days in bed- back in 7 days.
“Something stinks, again, and again….”
The actions China has taken to implement this round of lockdowns have been dystopian and Orwellian, to say the least:
For example, according to the NY Times:
◾all international flights to and from Shanghai have been halted
◾many roads to the city’s two airports have also been closed
◾the government performed P.C.R. tests on 25.67 million people
◾the government has not allowed residents to go to grocery stores
◾the government has put together tens of thousands of cots in two convention centers as quarantine centers – but they don’t have showering facilities
China is also, once again, sealing people in their homes. Videos on social media “show trapped residents howling and screaming from inside high-rise buildings at night,” The Independent wrote this week.
According to social media posts, the city is even using drones to try and calm the nerves of angry residents.
“Please comply [with] covid restrictions. Control your soul’s desire for freedom. Do not open the window or sing,” this drone is reported to be saying.
https://zububrothers.com/2022/04/17/something-is-rotten-in-the-state-of-shanghais-latest-covid-lockdowns/
—-————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
What do the ChiComs know, that, they are not telling the rest of the world?
Is there a more deadly Covid Virus and another Killer Vaccine about to be released on the rest of the world? Is there’s something about a new Covid that China knows about, that the rest of the world still doesn’t know about!
Is this Shanghai~ing of the innocent citizens of Shanghai into Virus prisons/, a test for what will be released on the rest of the world, later this year.?
Does CDC/Faucci and Joe Biden approve of this system, and will it become SOP in America?
PCR tests have been designed for testing many other diseases than just Covid. Who really knows what China is using PCR for?
“A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test detects genetic material from a pathogen or abnormal cell sample”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7106425/
Molecular diagnostics are revolutionising the clinical practice of infectious disease. Their effects will be significant in acute-care settings where timely and accurate diagnostic tools are critical for patient treatment decisions and outcomes. PCR is the most well-developed molecular technique up to now, and has a wide range of already fulfilled, and potential, clinical applications, including specific or broad-spectrum pathogen detection, evaluation of emerging novel infections, surveillance, early detection of biothreat agents, and antimicrobial resistance profiling. PCR-based methods may also be cost effective relative to traditional testing procedures. Further advancement of technology is needed to improve automation, optimise detection sensitivity and specificity, and expand the capacity to detect multiple targets simultaneously (multiplexing). This review provides an up-to-date look at the general principles, diagnostic value, and limitations of the most current PCR-based platforms as they evolve from bench to bedside.
Go to:
Pathogen identification: scope of the problem
In the USA, hospitals report well over 5 million cases of recognised infectious-disease-related illnesses annually.1 Significantly greater numbers remain unrecognised, both in the inpatient and community settings, resulting in substantial morbidity and mortality.2 Critical and timely intervention for infectious disease relies on rapid and accurate detection of the pathogen in the acute-care setting and beyond. The recent anthrax-related bioterrorist events and the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) further underscore the importance of rapid diagnostics for early, informed decision-making related to patient triage, infection control, treatment, and vaccination with life-and-death consequences for patients, health providers, and the public.3, 4, 5 Unfortunately, despite the recognition that outcomes from infectious illnesses are directly associated with time to pathogen identification, conventional hospital laboratories remain encumbered by traditional, slow multistep culture-based assays, which preclude application of diagnostic test results in the acute and critical-care settings. Other limitations of the conventional laboratory include extremely prolonged assay times for fastidious pathogens (up to several weeks); requirements for additional testing and wait times for characterising detected pathogens (ie, discernment of species, strain, virulence factors, and antimicrobial resistance); diminished test sensitivity for patients who have received antibiotics; and inability to culture certain pathogens in disease states associated with microbial infection.2, 6