Replies

Enlightened1 wrote: “That is not correct on experimental shots. Had you watched the full video you would understand this.”

No one has presented a credible argument that these vaccines are ‘experimental’. Most of the attempts to do so are nothing more than an attempt to manufacture an excuse not to take the vaccines. Legally, they are not ‘experimental. Legally they are fully approved.

No one has presented a credible argument that these vaccines are ‘experimental’.

No one has? So then you have all the data for what effects these "vaccines" have on you five years down the road? Three years? Tem years? What effect do they have on pregnant women? What other drugs have what kind of interactions with them?
If they aren't experimental, then why does no one know how many boosters are needed? One? Four? More?
If they aren't experimental, then why does their immunity only maybe sorta 'protect against severe cases and death'? Where is all the trial data, animal tests, etc? Oh right, they're trying to not release it for 75 years. What was the final result of the central groups?
If they aren't experimental, then why aren't any of them fully approved worldwide? Last I saw, Pfizer only has full approval in ten (yes, only TEN) countries, and JnJ, Moderna, AZ, even fewer. Hell, AZ, which has full approval in some countries, doesn't even have the EUA in these US!
If these drugs aren't experimental, why is the CDC suddenly putting out ads warning people of the "generic" danger of blood clots? When has that ever been a major issue before?
And so on. I don't see how someone can argue these shots aren't experimental - even with their politically-forced "full approval", they have ZERO data on long- and mid- term effects, because they haven't been around lung enough to know anything. That's just about the textbook definition of experimental! We don't know all the results!