The catch-22 of these mandates, and the biggest problem with them, is that by federal law (and several international ones) one cannot be forced into taking experimental drugs against one’s will. The FDA-approved shots aren’t available in the US, so these mandates should have been tossed out when they arose and refiled at a later date when legal shots became available. The active refusal of ALL religious and medical objections is also unconstitutional.
Not like you’ll read this and respond, anyway.
“Not like you’ll read this and respond, anyway.”
Absolutely I’m going to respond. The vaccines are not considered experimental by the people that make that decision, and the members have a right to turn down the injection. And that has nothing to do with discharge under art 92. That is for not following orders refusing a piece of the order if it is considered unsafe which it isn’t.
Get someone at the CDC or the FDA to make the determination that the vaccine is unsafe, and they will be forced to change the order. But until then, the members are bound by law and their consent to follow that order is expected in exchange for release. And again, the decision is totally up to the member, not the military in this case.
wy69