Indeed, Se post above.
Then there are mine own US calculations:
Part of the reason vaxxed case numbers are so high is because they make up a majority of the population. If 90% of a population is vaccinated (term used loosely), it would make sense that they’d make up 90% of cases when a vaccine is leaky and doesn’t actually prevent contraction.
The data is a little bit misleading.
It’s a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Only the unvaccinated have it.
I think the entire point is the vaccine doesn’t work.
“Part of the reason vaxxed case numbers are so high is because they make up a majority of the population. If 90% of a population is vaccinated (term used loosely), it would make sense that they’d make up 90% of cases when a vaccine is leaky and doesn’t actually prevent contraction. The data is a little bit misleading.”
You are right, Tacrolimus. This was done early on when relatively few had been vaccinated, with the Vacs pushers saying “it’s a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” The real story longterm will be what effect, if any, will the vaccines have on our innate immune system.
You are so right and what everyone needs to be aware of is the misuse of numbers, which is usually an error of not putting numbers in their proper context. In the case of the report that started this post, whole numbers were used for “vaxed” and “not vaxed” cases in new Omicron infections, but the whole numbers avoided what &=% of the population they represent.
I think the more honest reporting would not have implied the “vaxed” cases were worse off, but only that they do not seem to be necessarily better off than the “not vaxed”.
But that alone is enough of a a big deal as it counters the notion that ONLY the “vaxed” are helping to stem the spread of Covid19.
Indeed, Se post above.
Then there are mine own US calculations: