[Republican Wildcat]

To repeat: She was born in the United States and both of her parents were legally within the United States when she was born. That makes her a natural born citizen both under the definition of what that term meant when it was written into the Constitution and also multiple cases where this matter has been adjudicated in court.

That is simply reality. Neither you nor I get to decide what reality is. We just have to acknowledge it.

[T.B. Yoits]

It has not been adjudicated in court. It's not her anchor-baby citizenship in question, it's that she's not a natural born citizen.

[RideForever]

To repeat: She was born in the United States and both of her parents were legally within the United States when she was born.

Not funny how you again left out the qualifying phrase about ' ... not subject to a foreign jurisdiction', as in both Jamaica and India who issued Kamala's parents their passports defining their citizenship when they applied for U.S. visas. This is like the third time at least you have spouted your crippled logic.

[PA-RIVER]

David Ramsay, Americas first historian and member of congress, friend of George Washington, he disagrees with you in his writings. And the men in congress, 60 years later in documented debates, disagree with you. Millions of people disagree with you.

Kamala and her parents had a natural born choice to pick Indian Citizenship of her mother or the Jamaican citizenship of her father. They decided to use a law to gain USA citizenship, not derived from the nature of her parents citizenship.

Washington was smart, he wanted no divided loyalty. Yes, Kamala may not have divided loyalty to the USA. In fact, she has no loyalty to the USA.