I’m convinced that threads such as this one are meant to make us look like idiots and distract from actual DemocRAT vote fraud… which is REAL AND MASSIVE.
Please read this explanation and don’t join this DISTRACTION FROM REAL VOTE FRAUD.
https://elections.wi.gov/node/7516
This does make us look like idiots and throws muck on the real vote fraud issues.
Frankly, that doesn’t prove anything about the legitimacy of those voters.
It only gives an excuse for the fraud that can happen.
It still tells me there is a voter registration roll there that is not actually accurate and confirmed.
Why don’t they simply replace these default dates with something like N/A meaning not available?
Generally speaking, no data is less of a problem than fake data. Don’t these idiots realize that?
I disagree with your characterization of this issue.
And nothing personal, but I am not inclined to accept at face value the harmless explanation provided by the Wisconsin Elections Commission at the link you provided, put out there by the very people tasked with providing a secure election who have not only failed, but are probably complicit in fraud either wholly or partially.
I read the explanation at your link. It means absolutely nothing except a mechanical explanation. I have worked with databases both in the building and design of them and the workflows to enter data into them, and have encountered the 1/1/1900 date issue often enough.
The point is, that, at best, the voting rolls are inaccurate for whatever reason, and that is enough. If someone is going to illegally loot a house or store using a disaster as cover, it makes no difference if that disaster is due to flooding, fire, tornado, or war.
Likewise, it is 100% clear that for election fraud perpetrated using mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting (or any other scheme) to have a chance of succeeding, those fake ballots must be taken from real rolls of voters, not made up names, and especially the names of people who aren’t likely to vote.
Precaution one to anyone perpetrating election fraud is taking names on the voting rolls, so any checks back will show a registered voter. This also prevents the embarrassing error of having more votes in a precinct than regular voters.
Precaution two is to get names of people who either haven’t voted are aren’t going to vote, such as disabled people and many in nursing homes and such. This avoids the situation where someone is shown to have voted twice, or a vote was denied as already counted.
And I could go on. There are a lot of additional reasons to have valid voter rolls to prevent fraud. And don’t think for a second that the people perpetrating this kind of fraud don’t know where the weaknesses are, and why they should be exploited in specific ways to reduce the likelihood for detection.
There are two major issues here: One, is that the voter rolls are flawed and thus not useful as a tool for secure elections. That should be enough right there. The second is the maintenance of them. Under no circumstance should a voter be in that database without a valid date of birth and valid address. You do a mass printing of everyone with a 1/1/1901 (or 1918) date, mail them a postcard at the designated address telling them they need to re-register to vote, remove them from the rolls, and go forward from there.
You may think this makes us look like idiots to be concerned about it. In light of what happened in 2020, and likely for decades before that, for us to ignore any vector into a corrupt election (especially one so obvious as voter rolls with HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of invalid dates of birth) I think we would be idiots NOT to be concerned about it.
I agree with you, there is organized RAT voter fraud, without a doubt.
To me, as a self-exiled member of a dimocRAT family, I view stories like these differently. I witnessed instinctive dimocRAT voter fraud theology from birth.
To me, these stories are like someone grabbing a loose thread on a gigantic dimocRAT voter fraud quilt and starts pulling. The more we can tatter that quilt, the better.
Many dim families have grandma and grandpa voter registrations updated and handy even though they died in 1968 from heart attacks when Nixon won. Attitudes like this at the voter level encourages bigger more elaborate weaves in the voter fraud quilt.
I think of it like Rudy Giuliani’s “Broken Windows Theory” of policing that should be utilized trying to eliminate dimocRAT voter fraud, IMHO.