Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did over 100,000 people older than 124 years vote in Wisconsin?
American Thinker.com ^ | January 23, 2022 | Andrea Widburg

Posted on 01/23/2022 3:10:46 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Kaslin
Has anybody seen an actual name of one or more of these people? Amateurs playing with data bases can produce all sorts of stupid results.

And the part that actually bothers me about this is that only about 20 % of these people with bad registration dates actually voted in 2020. That's a very low number. Or would be, if any of this could be real.

41 posted on 01/23/2022 11:06:57 AM PST by Bernard ("The refusal to take sides on great moral issues is itself a decision." Fulton Sheen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel; deport
You guys are just confusing people with facts when their party plainly lays out how to think with minimal mental stress. Don't harsh their buzz!

Seriously though, it's obvious the Democrats are hard-scrabbling to retain all their cheating tactics while technology favors the smarter. It's a shame they have legions of willfully ignorant people still propping them up perpetuating their voting preference like Pavlov's dogs while not seeing how they're enabling their own destruction.

42 posted on 01/23/2022 2:38:01 PM PST by MikelTackNailer ("They have forgotten the face of their father .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MikelTackNailer

I think the mistake made by those who minimize this is that they think there was a monolithic method of stealing the election, and I don’t think there was.

I think we need to pay attention to, and combat all of the methods they use. Exploiting the voter rolls is just one of them they use.


43 posted on 01/23/2022 3:22:38 PM PST by rlmorel (Nothing can foster principles of freedom more effectively than the imposition of tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BiglyCommentary
If the counties that didn’t store DOB had their data batch loaded, all those voters would have a DOB year of 1900.

A review of the state’s voter roles showed that 569,277 voters registered on January 1, 1918.


If their DoB was randomly entered as 1900, what does that have to do with registration dates of 1918? A, that translates into a DoB of 1897, not 1900. B, where did all those registrations come from? 1918JAN01 doesn't sound like a default date, and if there was no registration date, shouldn't those registrations be deleted?
44 posted on 01/24/2022 9:23:31 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

Read the article details. DOB of 1900 plus default of 18 years to be of voting age = 1918.


45 posted on 01/24/2022 9:31:06 AM PST by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

“and if there was no registration date, shouldn’t those registrations be deleted”

If you were implementing some statewide DB and some counties did not have all the required fields such as DOB, you would still import those voters in, not leave a crippled unusable system that cant be rolled out on schedule. The assumption would be that those records would be cleaned up in the future.


46 posted on 01/24/2022 9:39:00 AM PST by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson