How can this be true especially in a such litigious setting? Medical workers like all other workers sign contracts before working. So, if this is the case, how did these seven work without contracts at the hospital "without contracts or obligations"?
No, something fishy is with this article. Something important is being deliberately left out as is the usual excrement that passes for journalism these days.
I’m a medical worker and I don’t have a contract. In an “at will” employment arrangement either party can end the association at any time. That seems to be the case here.